Whether G-CSF administration has beneficial effect on the outcome after assisted reproductive technology? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology

Research

S. Xie¹  B. Xu¹  Y. P. Li¹  Q. Zhang¹  J. Zhao¹ 

[1] Department of Reproductive Medicine, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 87 Xiangya Road, 410008, Changsha City, Hunan Province, People’s Republic of China;

关键词: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF);    Implantation rate;    Pregnancy rate;    Assisted reproductive technology (ART);   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12958-016-0197-2

 received in 2016-07-09, accepted in 2016-09-13,  发布年份 2016

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundPrevious studies have explored the effect of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration on the outcome of assisted reproductive technology (ART), and came into controversial conclusions. The present meta-analysis aims to assess whether G-CSF administration has beneficial effect on the outcome after ART.MethodThe electronic databases Pubmed, Embase and Google Scholar were searched up to May 2016. Articles that studied the effect of G-CSF administration on the outcome after ART were included in the present meta-analysis. Odds ratio (OR) with 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) were calculated to assess the effect of G-CSF administration on the outcome after ART. The outcomes of interest were implantation rate (IR) and pregnancy rate (PR).ResultsFour cohort studies with 1101 embryos transplantation assessed the effect of G-CSF administration on IR and 6 studies with 621 cycles assessed the role of G-CSF administration in PR. Meta-analysis did not found an increased embryo IR in G-CSF administration cycles [OR 1.59 (95 % CI 0.74–3.41). whereas the PR with G-CSF administration was significantly higher compared with cases without G-CSF administration [OR 2.03 (95 % CI 1.19–3.46)]. Additionally, we found that G-CSF administrated subcutaneously resulted in significantly higher PR [OR 3.12 (95 % CI 1.67–5.81)] and IR [OR 2.82 (95 % CI 1.29–6.15)] compared with control group, whereas G-CSF administrated via local uterine infusion had no beneficial effect on the PR [OR 1.42 (95 % CI 0.91–2.24)] and IR [OR 1.10 (95 % CI 0.76–1.60)] after ART.ConclusionsG-CSF administration may have beneficial effect on clinical pregnancy outcome after ART. Subcutaneous injection may be an optimal route of G-CSF administration. Further cohort studies are required to explore the mechanisms undergone the effect and investigate the best route and dose of G-CSF administration.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s). 2016