期刊论文详细信息
BMC Evolutionary Biology
Evaluating the role of Pleistocene refugia, rivers and environmental variation in the diversification of central African duikers (genera Cephalophus and Philantomba)
Research Article
Katrin Hils1  Henri A. Thomassen2  Nicola M. Anthony3  Anne R. Davis3  Katy Morgan3  Mary K. Gonder4  Patrick Mickala5  Stephan Ntie6  Hadrien Vanthomme7 
[1] Cheetah Conservation Fund, P.O. Box 1755, Otjiwarongo, Namibia;Comparative Zoology, Institute for Evolution and Ecology, University of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 28, 72076, Tübingen, Germany;Comparative Zoology, Institute for Evolution and Ecology, University of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 28, 72076, Tübingen, Germany;Department of Biological Sciences, University of New Orleans, 2000 Lakeshore Drive, 70148, New Orleans, LA, USA;Department of Biology, Drexel University, 3245 Chestnut St., 19104, Philadelphia, PA, USA;Department of Biology, Université des Sciences et Techniques de Masuku, B.P.943, Franceville, Gabon;Department of Biology, Université des Sciences et Techniques de Masuku, B.P.943, Franceville, Gabon;Department of Biological Sciences, University of New Orleans, 2000 Lakeshore Drive, 70148, New Orleans, LA, USA;Département Ecologie et Gestion de la Biodiversité, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, CNRS UMR 7179, Avenue du Petit Château, 91800, Brunoy, France;
关键词: Pleistocene;    Refugia;    Riverine;    Barriers;    Ecotone;    Phylogeography;    Generalized dissimilarity models;    Cephalophus;    Philantomba;    Africa;    Ecological gradients;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12862-017-1054-4
 received in 2017-06-14, accepted in 2017-08-18,  发布年份 2017
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundThis study aims to assess the role that Pleistocene refugia, rivers and local habitat conditions may have played in the evolutionary diversification of three central African duiker species (Cephalophus dorsalis, C. callipygus and Philantomba monticola). Genetic data from geo-referenced feces were collected from a wide range of sites across Central Africa. Historical patterns of population genetic structure were assessed using a ~ 650 bp fragment of the mitochondrial control region and contemporary patterns of genetic differentiation were evaluated using 12 polymorphic microsatellite loci.ResultsMitochondrial analyses revealed that populations of C. callipygus and P. monticola in the Gulf of Guinea refugium are distinct from other populations in west central Africa. All three species exhibit signatures of past population expansion across much of the study area consistent with a history of postglacial expansion. There was no strong evidence for a riverine barrier effect in any of the three species, suggesting that duikers can readily cross major rivers. Generalized dissimilarity models (GDM) showed that environmental variation explains most of the nuclear genetic differentiation in both C. callipygus and P. monticola. The forest-savanna transition across central Cameroon and the Plateaux Batéké region in southeastern Gabon show the highest environmentally-associated turnover in genetic variability. A pattern of genetic differentiation was also evident between the coast and forest interior that may reflect differences in precipitation and/or vegetation.ConclusionsFindings from this study highlight the historical impact of Pleistocene fragmentation and current influence of environmental variation on genetic structure in duikers. Conservation efforts should therefore target areas that harbor as much environmentally-associated genetic variation as possible in order to maximize species’ capacity to adapt to environmental change.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s). 2017

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202311103786139ZK.pdf 2384KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  • [48]
  • [49]
  • [50]
  • [51]
  • [52]
  • [53]
  • [54]
  • [55]
  • [56]
  • [57]
  • [58]
  • [59]
  • [60]
  • [61]
  • [62]
  • [63]
  • [64]
  • [65]
  • [66]
  • [67]
  • [68]
  • [69]
  • [70]
  • [71]
  • [72]
  • [73]
  • [74]
  • [75]
  • [76]
  • [77]
  • [78]
  • [79]
  • [80]
  • [81]
  • [82]
  • [83]
  • [84]
  • [85]
  • [86]
  • [87]
  • [88]
  • [89]
  • [90]
  • [91]
  • [92]
  • [93]
  • [94]
  • [95]
  • [96]
  • [97]
  • [98]
  • [99]
  • [100]
  • [101]
  • [102]
  • [103]
  • [104]
  • [105]
  • [106]
  • [107]
  • [108]
  • [109]
  • [110]
  • [111]
  • [112]
  • [113]
  • [114]
  • [115]
  • [116]
  • [117]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:1次 浏览次数:0次