| BMC Microbiology | |
| Xpert MTB/RIF assay can be used on archived gastric aspirate and induced sputum samples for sensitive diagnosis of paediatric tuberculosis | |
| Research Article | |
| Harleen M. S. Grewal1  Aparna Mukherjee2  Sushil K. Kabra2  Rakesh Lodha2  Varinder Singh3  Amit Singh4  Sarman Singh4  Suneel Prajapati4  Anneke C. Hesseling5  | |
| [1] Department Clinical Science, Infection, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway;Department of Microbiology, Haukeland University Hospital, N-5021, Bergen, Norway;Department of Paediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, 110 029, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India;Department of Paediatrics, Kalawati Saran Children Hospital, 110 001, New Delhi, India;Division of Clinical Microbiology and Molecular Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, 110 029, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India;Paediatric Research, Desmond Tutu TB Centre, University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch, South Africa; | |
| 关键词: Pediatrics Tuberculosis; India; Gastric Aspirate; Induced Sputum; Archived Samples; mPCR; MGIT Culture, Xpert MTB/RIF; | |
| DOI : 10.1186/s12866-015-0528-z | |
| received in 2015-06-11, accepted in 2015-09-22, 发布年份 2015 | |
| 来源: Springer | |
PDF
|
|
【 摘 要 】
BackgroundTuberculosis (TB) in children is neglected, mainly due to lack of sensitive diagnostic tools. Recently Xpert MTB/RIF assay has revolutionized the diagnostic field, but its usefulness in pediatric TB has not been reported from India and no report is available on its use on long term archived samples.MethodsWe recruited 130 pediatric patients with probable intrathoracic tuberculosis and their gastric aspirate (GA) and induced sputum (IS) samples on 2 consecutive days were collected between January 2009 and December 2012. All samples (n = 520) were subjected to smear examination, BACTEC-MGIT culture and in-house multiplex PCR. An aliquot of each sample was stored at −80 °C and tested in Xpert MTB/RIF assay in 2013.ResultsSample wise and patient wise detection rate of smear microscopy was 4.4 % and 10 %, while for BACTEC-MGIT culture this rate was 24.4 % and 46.9 %, respectively. Of the 130 day 1 GA samples, 31.5 % and 27.7 % day 2 GA samples were culture positive. Only 17.7 % GA samples were positive on both days. Of the 130 IS samples collected on day 1 and day 2, 15.4 % and 23.1 % samples were culture positive. A combination of GA and IS yielded best results. Combining both GA and IS, the overall sensitivity of Xpert MTB/RIF on smear and culture positive samples was 95.6 %. In smear negative and culture positive samples its sensitivity was 62.5 %. The duration of sample storage impacted the Xpert MTB/RIF test performance (p = 0.0001). In smear positive samples stored for 650–849 days, its sensitivity was 85.7 % and 77.1 % for IS and GA samples which dropped to 33.3 % and 50 %, respectively, if stored for more than 1050 days.DiscussionConfirmatory diagnosis of tuberculosis particularly in children is a medical challenge. No laboratory or radiological test can reach to a satisfactory level of diagnostic sensitivity. However, in this study we foundthat combination of multiple samples and multiple diagnostic tests can give much better yield, though notoptimum. In present study, combination of 2 gastric aspirates (GA) and 2 induced sputum (IS) samples collected on two consecutive days, and tested on three diagnostic methods yielded a significantly high detection rate. Despite long term storage, the overall sensitivity of Xpert MTB/RIF on smear and -culture positive samples remained very high. But after storing these samples under subfreezing conditions thesensitivity of Xpert MTB/RIF decreased significantly. This is expected because even if the sample is smear and culture positive, the count of surviving mycobacteria goes down, after several years this count can reach to a undetectable level.ConclusionThis report shows that smear and culture positive samples stored at subfreezing conditions for several years can be used in the Xpert MTB/RIF assay, while maintaining appreciable diagnostic test sensitivity and specificity.
【 授权许可】
CC BY
© Singh et al. 2015
【 预 览 】
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
| RO202311103635877ZK.pdf | 889KB |
【 参考文献 】
- [1]
- [2]
- [3]
- [4]
- [5]
- [6]
- [7]
- [8]
- [9]
- [10]
- [11]
- [12]
- [13]
- [14]
- [15]
- [16]
- [17]
- [18]
- [19]
- [20]
- [21]
- [22]
- [23]
- [24]
- [25]
- [26]
- [27]
- [28]
- [29]
- [30]
- [31]
- [32]
- [33]
- [34]
- [35]
- [36]
PDF