| Malaria Journal | |
| Active case detection for malaria elimination: a survey among Asia Pacific countries | |
| Research | |
| Nguyen M Hung1  Wichai Satimai2  Mario Baquilod3  Won-ja Lee4  Kelly C Sanders5  Chris Cotter5  Cara Smith Gueye5  Roly D Gosling5  Michelle S Hsiang6  Garib D Thakur7  Qi Gao8  Alby Bobogare9  Siv Sovannaroth1,10  Asik Surya1,11  George Taleo1,12  Christina Rundi1,13  Sarath L Deniyage1,14  Tashi Tobgay1,15  Lasse S Vestergaard1,16  Gawrie NL Galappaththy1,17  | |
| [1] 15National Institute for Malariology, Parasitology and Entomology, Ministry of Health, Vietnam, Luong The Vinh street, BC 10200, TuLiem District Hanoi, Vietnam;Bureau of Vector Borne Disease, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, 11000, Nonthaburi, Thailand;Department of Health, Philippines, Infectious Disease Office, National Center for Disease Prevention and Control, San Lazaro Compound, Sta.Cruz, Manila, Philippines;Divisions of Malaria and Parasitic Diseases, National Institute of Health, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Osong Health Technology Administration Complex187, Osong Sangmyeong 2 ro, Gangoe-myeon, 363-951, Cheongwon-gun, ChungCheongbuk-Do, Republic of Korea;Global Health Group, University of California, San Francisco, 50 Beale Street, Suite 1200, San Francisco, CA, USA;Global Health Group, University of California, San Francisco, 50 Beale Street, Suite 1200, San Francisco, CA, USA;Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, 500 Parnassus Ave, MU411E, San Francisco, CA, USA;Government of Nepal Ministry of Health and Population Department of Health Services, Epidemiology & Disease Control Division, Teku, Kathmandu Nepal;Jiangsu Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Meiyuan, 214064, Wuxi, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China;Ministry of Health Solomon Islands, PO Box 349, Honiara, Solomon Islands;National Center for Parasitology, Entomology and Malaria Control, Ministry of Health Cambodia, #372, Monivong Bld, Phnom Penh, Cambodia;National Malaria Control Program, Ministry of Health Republic of Indonesia, Ditjen PP & PL, Gd.C Lt.1, Jln. Percetakan Negara No.29, Jakarta, Indonesia;National Vector Borne Disease Control Program, Ministry of Health, Vanuatu, Port Vila Vanuatu;Sabah State Health Department, Ministry of Health, Malaysia, Level 3, Federal House 88814, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah Malaysia;Sri Lanka Anti-Malaria Campaign, Ministry of Health Sri Lanka, No: 555/5, Public Health Complex, Elvitigala Mawatha, 05, Narahenpita, Colombo, Sri Lanka;Vector-Borne Disease Control Programme, Ministry of Health, Royal Government of Bhutan, Post Box 191, Gelephu, Bhutan;Western Pacific Regional Office, World Health Organization, P.O. Box 2932, UN Avenue, 1000, Manila, Philippines;World Health Organization, Myanmar, PO Box 14 11182, Yangon, Myanmar; | |
| 关键词: Malaria elimination; Surveillance; Active case detection; Case investigation; | |
| DOI : 10.1186/1475-2875-12-358 | |
| received in 2013-07-12, accepted in 2013-09-29, 发布年份 2013 | |
| 来源: Springer | |
PDF
|
|
【 摘 要 】
BackgroundMoving from malaria control to elimination requires national malaria control programmes to implement strategies to detect both symptomatic and asymptomatic cases in the community. In order to do this, malaria elimination programmes follow up malaria cases reported by health facilities to carry out case investigations that will determine the origin of the infection, whether it has been imported or is due to local malaria transmission. If necessary, the malaria programme will also carry out active surveillance to find additional malaria cases in the locality to prevent further transmission. To understand current practices and share information on malaria elimination strategies, a survey specifically addressing country policies on case investigation and reactive case detection was carried out among fourteen countries of the Asia Pacific Malaria Elimination Network (APMEN).MethodsA questionnaire was distributed to the malaria control programme managers amongst 14 countries in the Asia Pacific who have national or sub-national malaria elimination goals.ResultsResults indicate that there are a wide variety of case investigation and active case detection activities employed by the 13 countries that responded to the survey. All respondents report conducting case investigation as part of surveillance activities. More than half of these countries conduct investigations for each case. Over half aim to accomplish the investigation within one to two days of a case report. Programmes collect a broad array of demographic data during investigation procedures and definitions for imported cases are varied across respondents. Some countries report intra-national (from a different province or district) importation while others report only international importation (from a different country). Reactive case detection in respondent countries is defined as screening households within a pre-determined radius in order to identify other locally acquired infections, whether symptomatic or asymptomatic. Respondents report that reactive case detection can be triggered in different ways, in some cases with only a single case report and in others if a defined threshold of multiple cases occurs. The spatial range of screening conducted varies from a certain number of households to an entire administrative unit (e g, village). Some countries target symptomatic people whereas others target all people in order to detect asymptomatic infections. The majority of respondent programmes collect a range of information from those screened for malaria, similar to the range of information collected during case investigation.ConclusionCase investigation and reactive case detection are implemented in the malaria elimination programmes in the Asia Pacific, however practices vary widely from country to country. There is little evidence available to support countries in deciding which methods to maintain, change or adopt for improved effectiveness and efficiency. The development and use of common evaluation metrics for these activities will allow malaria programmes to assess performance and results of resource-intensive surveillance measures and may benefit other countries that are considering implementing these activities.
【 授权许可】
CC BY
© Smith Gueye et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
【 预 览 】
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
| RO202311103607997ZK.pdf | 302KB |
【 参考文献 】
- [1]
- [2]
- [3]
- [4]
- [5]
- [6]
- [7]
- [8]
- [9]
- [10]
- [11]
- [12]
- [13]
- [14]
- [15]
- [16]
- [17]
- [18]
- [19]
- [20]
- [21]
- [22]
- [23]
- [24]
- [25]
PDF