期刊论文详细信息
BMC Infectious Diseases
Variable performance of models for predicting methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriage in European surgical wards
Research Article
George L Daikos1  Andrea Patroni2  Stephan Harbarth3  Andie S Lee4  Annie Chalfine5  Silvia Garilli6  Angelo Pan6  Ben S Cooper7  José Antonio Martínez8 
[1] First Department of Propaedeutic Medicine, Laiko General Hospital, Athens, Greece;General Medicine Unit, Ospedale di Esine, Esine, Italy;Infection Control Program, University of Geneva Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland;Infection Control Program, University of Geneva Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland;Departments of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia;Infection Control Unit, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, Paris, France;Infectious and Tropical Diseases Unit, Istituti Ospitalieri di Cremona, Cremona, Italy;Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand;Centre for Clinical Vaccinology and Tropical Medicine, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK;Service of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain;
关键词: Staphylococcus aureus;    Screening;    Predictive models;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12879-015-0834-y
 received in 2014-09-20, accepted in 2015-02-12,  发布年份 2015
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundPredictive models to identify unknown methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carriage on admission may optimise targeted MRSA screening and efficient use of resources. However, common approaches to model selection can result in overconfident estimates and poor predictive performance. We aimed to compare the performance of various models to predict previously unknown MRSA carriage on admission to surgical wards.MethodsThe study analysed data collected during a prospective cohort study which enrolled consecutive adult patients admitted to 13 surgical wards in 4 European hospitals. The participating hospitals were located in Athens (Greece), Barcelona (Spain), Cremona (Italy) and Paris (France). Universal admission MRSA screening was performed in the surgical wards. Data regarding demographic characteristics and potential risk factors for MRSA carriage were prospectively collected during the study period. Four logistic regression models were used to predict probabilities of unknown MRSA carriage using risk factor data: “Stepwise” (variables selected by backward elimination); “Best BMA” (model with highest posterior probability using Bayesian model averaging which accounts for uncertainty in model choice); “BMA” (average of all models selected with BMA); and “Simple” (model including variables selected >50% of the time by both Stepwise and BMA approaches applied to repeated random sub-samples of 50% of the data). To assess model performance, cross-validation against data not used for model fitting was conducted and net reclassification improvement (NRI) was calculated.ResultsOf 2,901 patients enrolled, 111 (3.8%) were newly identified MRSA carriers. Recent hospitalisation and presence of a wound/ulcer were significantly associated with MRSA carriage in all models. While all models demonstrated limited predictive ability (mean c-statistics <0.7) the Simple model consistently detected more MRSA-positive individuals despite screening fewer patients than the Stepwise model. Moreover, the Simple model improved reclassification of patients into appropriate risk strata compared with the Stepwise model (NRI 6.6%, P = .07).ConclusionsThough commonly used, models developed using stepwise variable selection can have relatively poor predictive value. When developing MRSA risk indices, simpler models, which account for uncertainty in model selection, may better stratify patients’ risk of unknown MRSA carriage.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© Lee et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202311103529120ZK.pdf 772KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:1次 浏览次数:1次