期刊论文详细信息
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
Efficiency and productivity assessment of public hospitals in Greece during the crisis period 2009–2012
Research
A. Constantopoulos1  J. Yfantopoulos1  M. Nektarios2  P. Xenos2  P. Tinios2  N. Polyzos3 
[1] School of Economics and Political Science, University of Athens, 6 Themistokleous Str., 10678, Athens, Greece;School of Finance and Statistics, University of Piraeus, 80 Karaoli & Dimitriou Str, 18534, Piraeus, Greece;School of Social, Political and Economic Science, University of Thrace, 12 Vasilisis Sofias Str, 67100, Xanthi, Greece;
关键词: Efficiency;    Hospitals;    Productivity;    Malmquist;    Tobit;    Greece;    Crisis;    C14;    D24;    H51;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12962-017-0068-5
 received in 2015-10-25, accepted in 2017-04-19,  发布年份 2017
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundThis study is an initial effort to examine the dynamics of efficiency and productivity in Greek public hospitals during the first phase of the crisis 2009–2012. Data were collected by the Ministry of Health after several quality controls ensuring comparability and validity of hospital inputs and outputs. Productivity is estimated using the Malmquist Indicator, decomposing the estimated values into efficiency and technological change.MethodsHospital efficiency and productivity growth are calculated by bootstrapping the non-parametric Malmquist analysis. The advantage of this method is the estimation efficiency and productivity through the corresponding confidence intervals. Additionally, a Random-effects Tobit model is explored to investigate the impact of contextual factors on the magnitude of efficiency.ResultsFindings reveal substantial variations in hospital productivity over the period from 2009 to 2012. The economic crisis of 2009 had a negative impact in productivity. The average Malmquist Productivity Indicator (MPI) score is 0.72 with unity signifying stable production. Approximately 91% of the hospitals score lower than unity. Substantial increase is observed between 2010 and 2011, as indicated by the average MPI score which fluctuates to 1.52. Moreover, technology change scored more than unity in more than 75% of hospitals. The last period (2011–2012) has shown stabilization in the expansionary process of productivity. The main factors contributing to overall productivity gains are increases in occupancy rates, type and size of the hospital.ConclusionsThis paper attempts to offer insights in efficiency and productivity growth for public hospitals in Greece. The results suggest that the average hospital experienced substantial productivity growth between 2009 and 2012 as indicated by variations in MPI. Almost all of the productivity increase was due to technology change which could be explained by the concurrent managerial and financing healthcare reforms. Hospitals operating under decreasing returns to scale could achieve higher efficiency rates by reducing their capacity. However, certain social objectives should also be considered. Emphasis perhaps should be placed in utilizing and advancing managerial and organizational reforms, so that the benefits of technological improvements will have a continuing positive impact in the future.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2017

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202311103508607ZK.pdf 905KB PDF download
12951_2016_246_Article_IEq7.gif 1KB Image download
12951_2016_246_Article_IEq8.gif 1KB Image download
12951_2016_246_Article_IEq9.gif 1KB Image download
Fig. 2 2232KB Image download
Fig. 1 573KB Image download
Fig. 6 1548KB Image download
12951_2016_246_Article_IEq16.gif 1KB Image download
12936_2017_2118_Article_IEq1.gif 2KB Image download
【 图 表 】

12936_2017_2118_Article_IEq1.gif

12951_2016_246_Article_IEq16.gif

Fig. 6

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

12951_2016_246_Article_IEq9.gif

12951_2016_246_Article_IEq8.gif

12951_2016_246_Article_IEq7.gif

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  • [48]
  • [49]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:7次 浏览次数:1次