期刊论文详细信息
Microbiome
Bacillus subtilis and Macleaya cordata extract regulate the rumen microbiota associated with enteric methane emission in dairy cows
Research
Li-feng Dong1  Qi-yu Diao1  Yan Tu1  Peng Jia2 
[1] Institute of Feed Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Sino-US Joint Lab On Nutrition and Metabolism of Ruminant/Key Laboratory of Feed Biotechnology of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, 100081, Beijing, People’s Republic of China;Institute of Feed Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Sino-US Joint Lab On Nutrition and Metabolism of Ruminant/Key Laboratory of Feed Biotechnology of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, 100081, Beijing, People’s Republic of China;State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-Ecosystems, Key Laboratory of Grassland Livestock Industry Innovation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, 730020, Lanzhou, People’s Republic of China;
关键词: Bacillus subtilis;    Dairy cows;    Macleaya cordata;    Metagenomics;    Methane;    Rumen microbiota;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s40168-023-01654-3
 received in 2022-12-19, accepted in 2023-08-23,  发布年份 2023
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundRuminant livestock production is a considerable source of enteric methane (CH4) emissions. In a previous study, we found that dietary inclusions of Bacillus subtilis (BS) and Macleaya cordata extract (MCE) increased dry matter intake and milk production, while reduced enteric CH4 emission in dairy cows. The objective of this study was to further elucidate the impact of feeding BS and MCE on rumen methanogenesis in dairy cows using rumen metagenomics techniques.ResultsSixty dairy cows were blocked in 20 groups of 3 cows accordingly to their live weight, milk yield, and days in milk, and within each group, the 3 cows were randomly allocated to 1 of 3 treatments: control diet (CON), control diet plus BS (BS), and control diet plus MCE (MCE). After 75 days of feeding experimental diets, 12 cows were selected from each treatment for collection of rumen samples for the metagenomic sequencing. Results showed that BS decreased ruminal acetate and butyrate, while increased propionate concentrations, resulting in decreased acetate:propionate ratio. The metagenomics analysis revealed that MCE reduced relative abundances of Methanobrevibacter wolinii, Methanobrevibacter sp. AbM4, Candidatus Methanomassiliicoccus intestinalis, Methanobrevibacter cuticularis, Methanomicrobium mobile, Methanobacterium formicicum, and Methanobacterium congolense. Both BS and MCE reduced relative abundances of Methanosphaera sp. WGK6 and Methanosphaera stadtmanae. The co-occurrence network analysis of rumen bacteria and archaea revealed that dietary treatments influenced microbial interaction patterns, with BS and MCE cows having more and stronger associations than CON cows. The random forest and heatmaps analysis demonstrated that the Halopenitus persicus was positively correlated with fat- and protein-corrected milk yield; Clostridium sp. CAG 269, Clostridium sp. 27 14, Haloarcula rubripromontorii, and Methanobrevibacter curvatus were negatively correlated with rumen acetate and butyrate concentrations, and acetate:propionate ratio, whereas Selenomonas rumiantium was positively correlated with those variables.ConclusionsThe present results provided new information for mitigation of enteric methane emissions of dairy cows by feeding BS and MCE to influence rumen microbial activities. This fundamental knowledge is essential for developing enteric CH4 reduction strategies to mitigate climate change and reduce dietary energy waste.7hDgYvMWQEHgf6eUhi7c3NVideo Abstract

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202311103389464ZK.pdf 6929KB PDF download
12936_2017_2118_Article_IEq1.gif 2KB Image download
12936_2016_1411_Article_IEq110.gif 1KB Image download
12936_2023_4742_Article_IEq9.gif 1KB Image download
Fig. 6 2050KB Image download
Fig. 2 367KB Image download
MediaObjects/40249_2023_1143_MOESM2_ESM.docx 23KB Other download
Fig. 5 1739KB Image download
Fig. 10 2946KB Image download
Fig. 4 467KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Fig. 4

Fig. 10

Fig. 5

Fig. 2

Fig. 6

12936_2023_4742_Article_IEq9.gif

12936_2016_1411_Article_IEq110.gif

12936_2017_2118_Article_IEq1.gif

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  • [48]
  • [49]
  • [50]
  • [51]
  • [52]
  • [53]
  • [54]
  • [55]
  • [56]
  • [57]
  • [58]
  • [59]
  • [60]
  • [61]
  • [62]
  • [63]
  • [64]
  • [65]
  • [66]
  • [67]
  • [68]
  • [69]
  • [70]
  • [71]
  • [72]
  • [73]
  • [74]
  • [75]
  • [76]
  • [77]
  • [78]
  • [79]
  • [80]
  • [81]
  • [82]
  • [83]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:8次 浏览次数:0次