Academic contributions to the development of evidence and policy systems: an EPPI Centre collective autoethnography

Health Research Policy and Systems

Research

Mukdarut Bangpan¹  Kelly Dickson¹  Sandy Oliver¹ 

[1] Social Research Institute, University College London, 10 Woburn Square, WC1H 0NR, London, United Kingdom;

关键词: Evidence systems;    Policy development;    Collaboration;    Co-production;    Autoethnography;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12961-023-01051-0

 received in 2023-02-16, accepted in 2023-09-11,  发布年份 2023

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundEvidence for policy systems emerging around the world combine the fields of research synthesis, evidence-informed policy and public engagement with research. We conducted this retrospective collective autoethnography to understand the role of academics in developing such systems.MethodsWe constructed a timeline of EPPI Centre work and associated events since 1990. We employed: Transition Theory to reveal emerging and influential innovations; and Transformative Social Innovation theory to track their increasing depth, reach and embeddedness in research and policy organisations.FindingsThe EPPI Centre, alongside other small research units, collaborated with national and international organisations at the research-policy interface to incubate, spread and embed new ways of working with evidence and policy. Sustainable change arising from research-policy interactions was less about uptake and embedding of innovations, but more about co-developing and tailoring innovations with organisations to suit their missions and structures for creating new knowledge or using knowledge for decisions. Both spreading and embedding innovation relied on mutual learning that both accommodated and challenged established assumptions and values of collaborating organisations as they adapted to closer ways of working. The incubation, spread and embedding of innovations have been iterative, with new ways of working inspiring further innovation as they spread and embedded. Institutionalising evidence for policy required change in both institutions generating evidence and institutions developing policy.ConclusionsKey mechanisms for academic contributions to advancing evidence for policy were: contract research focusing attention at the research-policy interface; a willingness to work in unfamiliar fields; inclusive ways of working to move from conflict to consensus; and incentives and opportunities for reflection and consolidating learning.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023

【 图 表 】

Fig. 9