期刊论文详细信息
BMC Evolutionary Biology
Phylogenetic relationships among Staphylococcus species and refinement of cluster groups based on multilocus data
Research Article
Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan1  Alexander M Cole1  Ryan P Lamers2  Todd A Castoe3  Christopher L Parkinson4  Sergio Tafur5 
[1] Burnett School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, 4000 Central Florida Boulevard, 32816, Orlando, FL, USA;Burnett School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, 4000 Central Florida Boulevard, 32816, Orlando, FL, USA;Department of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, Michael G. DeGroote Institute for Infectious Disease Research, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, L8S 4K1, Hamilton, ON, Canada;Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12801 17th Avenue, 80045, Aurora, CO, USA;Department of Biology, University of Central Florida, 4000 Central Florida Boulevard, 32816, Orlando, FL, USA;Stokes Advanced Research Computing Center, Institute for Simulation and Training, University of Central Florida, 3100 Technology Parkway, 32826, Orlando, FL, USA;
关键词: Bayesian Inference;    Bootstrap Support;    Lateral Gene Transfer;    Novobiocin;    Maximum Likelihood Analysis;   
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2148-12-171
 received in 2011-09-01, accepted in 2012-08-30,  发布年份 2012
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundEstimates of relationships among Staphylococcus species have been hampered by poor and inconsistent resolution of phylogenies based largely on single gene analyses incorporating only a limited taxon sample. As such, the evolutionary relationships and hierarchical classification schemes among species have not been confidently established. Here, we address these points through analyses of DNA sequence data from multiple loci (16S rRNA gene, dnaJ, rpoB, and tuf gene fragments) using multiple Bayesian and maximum likelihood phylogenetic approaches that incorporate nearly all recognized Staphylococcus taxa.ResultsWe estimated the phylogeny of fifty-seven Staphylococcus taxa using partitioned-model Bayesian and maximum likelihood analysis, as well as Bayesian gene-tree species-tree methods. Regardless of methodology, we found broad agreement among methods that the current cluster groups require revision, although there was some disagreement among methods in resolution of higher order relationships. Based on our phylogenetic estimates, we propose a refined classification for Staphylococcus with species being classified into 15 cluster groups (based on molecular data) that adhere to six species groups (based on phenotypic properties).ConclusionsOur findings are in general agreement with gene tree-based reports of the staphylococcal phylogeny, although we identify multiple previously unreported relationships among species. Our results support the general importance of such multilocus assessments as a standard in microbial studies to more robustly infer relationships among recognized and newly discovered lineages.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   
© Lamers et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012. This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202311102975752ZK.pdf 1298KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  • [48]
  • [49]
  • [50]
  • [51]
  • [52]
  • [53]
  • [54]
  • [55]
  • [56]
  • [57]
  • [58]
  • [59]
  • [60]
  • [61]
  • [62]
  • [63]
  • [64]
  • [65]
  • [66]
  • [67]
  • [68]
  • [69]
  • [70]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:3次 浏览次数:2次