期刊论文详细信息
BMC Public Health
Risk factors for poor engagement with a smart pillbox adherence intervention among persons on tuberculosis treatment in Ethiopia
Research
Gedion Teferra Weldemichael1  Mamush Sahile1  Hiwot Yazew1  Tofik Abdurhman1  Demekech Gadissa1  Ahmed Bedru1  Amanuel Shiferaw1  Mahilet Belachew1  Demelash Assefa1  Degu Jerene2  Job van Rest2  Nicola Foster3  Amare Worku Tadesse3  Martina Cusinato4  Katherine Linda Fielding5 
[1] KNCV Tuberculosis Plus, The Hague, Ethiopia;KNCV Tuberculosis Plus, The Hague, Netherlands;TB Centre, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London, School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), London, UK;TB Centre, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London, School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), London, UK;Bristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, Bristol, UK;TB Centre, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London, School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), London, UK;School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa;
关键词: Drug-sensitive tuberculosis;    Smart pillbox;    Digital adherence technologies;    Poor engagement;    Ethiopia;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12889-023-16905-z
 received in 2023-05-17, accepted in 2023-10-05,  发布年份 2023
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundNon-adherence to tuberculosis treatment increases the risk of poor treatment outcomes. Digital adherence technologies (DATs), including the smart pillbox (EvriMED), aim to improve treatment adherence and are being widely evaluated. As part of the Adherence Support Coalition to End TB (ASCENT) project we analysed data from a cluster-randomised trial of DATs and differentiated care in Ethiopia to examine individual-factors for poor engagement with the smart pillbox.MethodsData were obtained from a cohort of trial participants with drug-sensitive tuberculosis (DS-TB) whose treatment started between 1 December 2020 and 1 May 2022, and who were using the smart pillbox. Poor engagement with the pillbox was defined as (i) > 20% days with no digital confirmation and (ii) the count of days with no digital confirmation, and calculated over a two evaluation periods (56-days and 168-days). Logistic random effects regression was used to model > 20% days with no digital confirmation and negative binomial random effects regression to model counts of days with no digital confirmation, both accounting for clustering of individuals at the facility-level.ResultsAmong 1262 participants, 10.8% (133/1262) over 56-days and 15.8% (200/1262) over 168-days had > 20% days with no digital confirmation. The odds of poor engagement was less among participants in the higher stratum of socio-economic position (SEP) over 56-days. Overall, 4,689/67,315 expected doses over 56-days and 18,042/199,133 expected doses over 168-days were not digitally confirmed. Compared to participants in the poorest SEP stratum, participants in the wealthiest stratum had lower rates of days not digitally confirmed over 168-days (adjusted rate ratio [RRa]:0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65, 0.96). In both evaluation periods (56-days and 168-days), HIV-positive status (RRa:1.29; 95%CI: 1.02, 1.63 and RRa:1.28; 95%CI: 1.07, 1.53), single/living independent (RRa:1.31; 95%CI: 1.03, 1.67 and RRa:1.38; 95%CI: 1.16, 1.64) and separated/widowed (RRa:1.40; 95%CI: 1.04, 1.90 and RRa:1.26; 95%CI: 1.00, 1.58) had higher rates of counts of days with no digital confirmation.ConclusionPoorest SEP stratum, HIV-positive status, single/living independent and separated/ widowed were associated with poor engagement with smart pillbox among people with DS-TB in Ethiopia. Differentiated care for these sub-groups may reduce risk of non-adherence to TB treatment.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202311102849118ZK.pdf 974KB PDF download
Fig. 3 707KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Fig. 3

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:1次 浏览次数:2次