Do beneficiaries’ views matter in healthcare purchasing decisions? Experiences from the Nigerian tax-funded health system and the formal sector social health insurance program of the National Health Insurance Scheme

International Journal for Equity in Health

Research

Ayako Honda¹  Kara Hanson²  Nkoli Ezumah³  Enyi Etiaba⁴  Ogochukwu Ibe⁴  Obinna Onwujekwe⁴ 

[1] Department of Economics, Sophia University, Tokyo, Japan;Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK;Department of Health Administration and Management, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Nigeria, Enugu Campus, Enugu, Nigeria;Department of Sociology and Anthropology, University of Nigeria, Nsukka Campus, Nsukka, Nigeria;Department of Health Administration and Management, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Nigeria, Enugu Campus, Enugu, Nigeria;Health Policy Research Group, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria, Enugu Campus, Enugu, Nigeria;

关键词: Strategic purchasing;    Public accountability;    Citizen engagement;    Community participation;    Tax-funded system;    Formal sector social health insurance program;    National Health Insurance Scheme;    Nigeria;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12939-017-0711-y

 received in 2017-06-14, accepted in 2017-12-15,  发布年份 2017

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundPurchasing is a health financing function that involves the transfer of pooled resources to providers on behalf of a covered population. Little attention has been paid to the extent to which the views of that population  are reflected in purchasing decisions. This article explores how purchasers in two financing mechanisms: the Formal Sector Social Health Insurance Programme (FSSHIP) operating under the Nigerian National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS), and the tax-funded health system perform their roles in light of their responsibilities to the populations.MethodsA case study approach was adopted in which each financing mechanism is a case. Sixteen (16) in-depth interviews with purchasers and eight (8) focus group discussions with beneficiaries were held. Agency and organizational behavioural theories were used to characterise the purchaser-citizen relationships. A deductive framework approach was used to assess whether actions identified in a model of ‘ideal’ strategic purchasing actions were undertaken in each case.ResultsFor both cases, mechanisms exist to reflect people’s health needs in purchasing decisions, including quantitative and qualitative needs assessment, mechanisms to raise awareness of benefit entitlements and allow choice. However, purchasers do not use the mechanisms to effectively engage with and hold themselves accountable to the people. In the tax-funded system, weak information systems and unclear communication channels between the purchaser and citizens constrain assessment of needs; while timeliness of health information and poor engagement practices of Health Maintenance Organisations (HMOs) are the main constraints in FSSHIP. Inadequate information sharing in both mechanisms limits beneficiaries’ awareness of entitlements. Although beneficiaries of FSSHIP can choose providers, lack of information on the quality of services offered by providers constrains rational decision-making and the inability to change HMOs reduces HMO responsiveness to beneficiary needs.ConclusionsResponsiveness and accountability to beneficiaries are undervalued by purchasers in both financing mechanisms. In the tax-funded system, civil society organisations can facilitate engagement and accountability of purchasers and the people. In FSSHIP, NHIS needs to provide stronger stewardship of HMOs to promote effective engagement with members. Furthermore, the NHIS should introduce mechanisms that allow FSSHIP members to choose their own HMO, which could encourage HMOs to be more responsive to members.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s). 2017