Systematic meta-review of supported self-management for asthma: a healthcare perspective

BMC Medicine

Research Article

Luke Daines¹  Aziz Sheikh¹  Hilary Pinnock¹  Stephanie J. C. Taylor²  Eleni Epiphaniou²  Hannah L. Parke²  Chris J. Griffiths²  Gemma Pearce³  Maria Panagioti⁴  Peter Bower⁴ 

[1] Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Allergy and Respiratory Research Group, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Doorway 3, Medical School, Teviot Place, EH8 9AG, Edinburgh, UK;Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK;Centre for Technology Enabled Health Research (CTEHR), Coventry University, Coventry, UK;NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK;

关键词: Supported self-management;    Asthma;    Systematic meta-review;    Health economic analysis;    Meta-analysis;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12916-017-0823-7

 received in 2016-09-28, accepted in 2017-02-20,  发布年份 2017

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundSupported self-management has been recommended by asthma guidelines for three decades; improving current suboptimal implementation will require commitment from professionals, patients and healthcare organisations. The Practical Systematic Review of Self-Management Support (PRISMS) meta-review and Reducing Care Utilisation through Self-management Interventions (RECURSIVE) health economic review were commissioned to provide a systematic overview of supported self-management to inform implementation. We sought to investigate if supported asthma self-management reduces use of healthcare resources and improves asthma control; for which target groups it works; and which components and contextual factors contribute to effectiveness. Finally, we investigated the costs to healthcare services of providing supported self-management.MethodsWe undertook a meta-review (systematic overview) of systematic reviews updated with randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published since the review search dates, and health economic meta-analysis of RCTs. Twelve electronic databases were searched in 2012 (updated in 2015; pre-publication update January 2017) for systematic reviews reporting RCTs (and update RCTs) evaluating supported asthma self-management. We assessed the quality of included studies and undertook a meta-analysis and narrative synthesis.ResultsA total of 27 systematic reviews (n = 244 RCTs) and 13 update RCTs revealed that supported self-management can reduce hospitalisations, accident and emergency attendances and unscheduled consultations, and improve markers of control and quality of life for people with asthma across a range of cultural, demographic and healthcare settings. Core components are patient education, provision of an action plan and regular professional review. Self-management is most effective when delivered in the context of proactive long-term condition management. The total cost (n = 24 RCTs) of providing self-management support is offset by a reduction in hospitalisations and accident and emergency visits (standard mean difference 0.13, 95% confidence interval −0.09 to 0.34).ConclusionsEvidence from a total of 270 RCTs confirms that supported self-management for asthma can reduce unscheduled care and improve asthma control, can be delivered effectively for diverse demographic and cultural groups, is applicable in a broad range of clinical settings, and does not significantly increase total healthcare costs. Informed by this comprehensive synthesis of the literature, clinicians, patient-interest groups, policy-makers and providers of healthcare services should prioritise provision of supported self-management for people with asthma as a core component of routine care.Systematic review registrationRECURSIVE: PROSPERO CRD42012002694; PRISMS: PROSPERO does not register meta-reviews

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s). 2017