What happens to lost nets: a multi-country analysis of reasons for LLIN attrition using 14 household surveys in four countries

Malaria Journal

Research

Matthew Lynch¹  Hannah Koenker¹  Emmanuel O Onyefunafoa²  Richmond A Selby³  Tarekegn Abeku⁴  Celine Zegers de Beyl⁴  Albert Kilian⁵  Megan Fotheringham⁶ 

[1] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Center for Communication Programs, Baltimore, MD, USA;Malaria Consortium, Abuja, Nigeria;Malaria Consortium, Kampala, Uganda;Malaria Consortium, London, UK;Tropical Health LLP, Montagut, Girona, Spain;Malaria Consortium, London, UK;United States Agency for International Development, Washington, DC, USA;

关键词: Malaria;    Malaria Prevention;    Wealth Quintile;    Mass Campaign;    Median Lifespan;   

DOI  :  10.1186/1475-2875-13-464

 received in 2014-10-06, accepted in 2014-11-18,  发布年份 2014

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundWhile significant focus has been given to net distribution, little is known about what is done with nets that leave a household, either to be used by others or when they are discarded. To better understand the magnitude of sharing LLIN between households and patterns of discarding LLIN, the present study pools data from 14 post-campaign surveys to draw larger conclusions about the fate of nets that leave households.MethodsData from 14 sub-national post-campaign surveys conducted in Ghana, Senegal, Nigeria (10 states), and Uganda between 2009 and 2012 were pooled. Survey design and data collection methods were similar across surveys. The timing of surveys ranged from 2–16 months following their respective mass LLIN distributions.ResultsAmong the 14 surveys a total of 14,196 households reported owning 25,447 nets of any kind, of which 23,955 (94%) were LLINs. In addition, a total of 4,102 nets were reported to have left the households in the sample: 63% were discarded, and 34% were given away. Only 255 of the discarded nets were reported used for other purposes, representing less than 1% of the total sample of nets. The majority (62.5%) of nets given away were given to or taken by relatives, while 31.1% were given to non-relatives. Campaign nets were almost six times (OR 5.95, 4.25-8.32, p < 0.0001) more likely to be given away than non-campaign nets lost during the same period. Nets were primarily given away within the first few months after distribution. The overall rate of net redistribution was 5% of all nets.Discussion and conclusionIntra-household re-allocation of nets does occur, but was sensitive to current household net ownership and the time elapsed since mass distribution. These factors can be addressed programmatically to further facilitate reallocation within a given community. Secondly, the overwhelming majority of nets were used for malaria prevention. Of the repurposed nets (<1% overall), the majority were already considered too torn, indicating they had already served out their useful life for malaria prevention. National programmes and donor agencies should remain confident that overall, their investments in LLIN are being appropriately used.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© Koenker et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014