Predicting the functions of a protein from its ability to associate with other molecules

BMC Bioinformatics

Research Article

Kamal Taha¹  Paul D. Yoo² 

[1] Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates;Faculty of Science and Technology, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK;

关键词: Gene Ontology;    Semantic Relationship;    Test Protein;    Semantic Rule;    PubMed Abstract;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12859-016-0882-3

 received in 2015-05-12, accepted in 2016-01-05,  发布年份 2016

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundAll proteins associate with other molecules. These associated molecules are highly predictive of the potential functions of proteins. The association of a protein and a molecule can be determined from their co-occurrences in biomedical abstracts. Extensive semantically related co-occurrences of a protein’s name and a molecule’s name in the sentences of biomedical abstracts can be considered as indicative of the association between the protein and the molecule. Dependency parsers extract textual relations from a text by determining the grammatical relations between words in a sentence. They can be used for determining the textual relations between proteins and molecules. Despite their success, they may extract textual relations with low precision. This is because they do not consider the semantic relationships between terms in a sentence (i.e., they consider only the structural relationships between the terms). Moreover, they may not be well suited for complex sentences and for long-distance textual relations.ResultsWe introduce an information extraction system called PPFBM that predicts the functions of unannotated proteins from the molecules that associate with these proteins. PPFBM represents each protein by the other molecules that associate with it in the abstracts referenced in the protein’s entries in reliable biological databases. It automatically extracts each co-occurrence of a protein-molecule pair that represents semantic relationship between the pair. Towards this, we present novel semantic rules that identify the semantic relationship between each co-occurrence of a protein-molecule pair using the syntactic structures of sentences and linguistics theories. PPFBM determines the functions of an un-annotated protein p as follows. First, it determines the set Sr of annotated proteins that is semantically similar to p by matching the molecules representing p and the annotated proteins. Then, it assigns p the functional category FC if the significance of the frequency of occurrences of Sr in abstracts associated with proteins annotated with FC is statistically significantly different than the significance of the frequency of occurrences of Sr in abstracts associated with proteins annotated with all other functional categories. We evaluated the quality of PPFBM by comparing it experimentally with two other systems. Results showed marked improvement.ConclusionsThe experimental results demonstrated that PPFBM outperforms other systems that predict protein function from the textual information found within biomedical abstracts. This is because these system do not consider the semantic relationships between terms in a sentence (i.e., they consider only the structural relationships between the terms). PPFBM’s performance over these system increases steadily as the number of training protein increases. That is, PPFBM’s prediction performance becomes more accurate constantly, as the size of training proteins gets larger. This is because every time a new set of test proteins is added to the current set of training proteins. A demo of PPFBM that annotates each input Yeast protein (SGD (Saccharomyces Genome Database). Available at: http://www.yeastgenome.org/download-data/curation) with the functions of Gene Ontology terms is available at: (see Appendix for more details about the demo)http://ecesrvr.kustar.ac.ae:8080/PPFBM/.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© Taha and Yoo. 2016

【 图 表 】

12951_2017_255_Article_IEq52.gif

12951_2017_255_Article_IEq51.gif

Fig. 4

Fig. 2

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

Fig. 4

Fig. 10

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Scheme 1

12951_2016_223_Article_IEq1.gif

12951_2017_255_Article_IEq50.gif

12951_2017_255_Article_IEq49.gif

12936_2017_1904_Article_IEq1.gif

Fig. 1

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

42004_2023_1031_Figa_HTML.png

12951_2016_246_Article_IEq9.gif

42004_2023_1031_Article_IEq16.gif

12951_2016_246_Article_IEq8.gif

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

12951_2017_255_Article_IEq48.gif

Fig. 3

Fig. 5

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 10

Fig. 1

Fig. 4

Fig. 2

Fig. 8

12951_2016_246_Article_IEq7.gif

Fig. 1

12951_2016_246_Article_IEq6.gif

Fig. 8

40538_2023_473_Article_IEq1.gif

12951_2015_155_Article_IEq78.gif

Fig. 7

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

12951_2015_155_Article_IEq77.gif

Fig. 2

Scheme. 1

Fig. 1