期刊论文详细信息
BMC Genomics
Genome-enabled predictions for fruit weight and quality from repeated records in European peach progenies
Research Article
Sabrina Micali1  Ignazio Verde1  Thierry Pascal2  Benedicte Quilot-Turion2  Maria José Aranzana3  Pere Arús3  Nelson Nazzicari4  Filippo Biscarini5  Alessandra Stella5  Laura Rossini6  Cassia da Silva Linge7  Daniele Bassi7  Patrick Lambert7  Igor Pacheco8  Marco Bink9 
[1] Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l’analisi dell’economia agraria (CREA) — Centro di Ricerca per la Frutticoltura (CREA-FRU), Via di Fioranello 52, Roma, Italy;GAFL, INRA, 84140, Montfavet, France;IRTA, Centre de Recerca en Agrigenòmica CSIC-IRTA-UAB-UB, Campus UAB, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallés), Barcelona, Spain;PTP Science Park, Via Einstein - Loc. Cascina Codazza, Lodi, Italy;Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA) Research Centre for Fodder Crops and Dairy Productions, Lodi, Italy;PTP Science Park, Via Einstein - Loc. Cascina Codazza, Lodi, Italy;IBBA-CNR, Via Edoardo Bassini, 15, 20133, Milan, Italy;PTP Science Park, Via Einstein - Loc. Cascina Codazza, Lodi, Italy;Università degli Studi di Milano - DiSAA, Via Celoria 2, Milano, Italy;Università degli Studi di Milano - DiSAA, Via Celoria 2, Milano, Italy;Università degli Studi di Milano - DiSAA, Via Celoria 2, Milano, Italy;Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology - INTA, Universidad de Chile, Av El Líbano 5524, Santiago, Chile;Wageningen UR Biometris, Wageningen, The Netherlands;Present Address: Hendrix Genetics Research, Technology & Services B.V., P.O. Box 114, 5830AC, Boxmeer NL, The Netherlands;
关键词: Prunus persica;    Genome-enabled predictions;    Fruit weight;    Sugar content;    Titratable acidity;    Genotype imputation;    Repeatability model;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12864-017-3781-8
 received in 2017-01-27, accepted in 2017-05-10,  发布年份 2017
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundHighly polygenic traits such as fruit weight, sugar content and acidity strongly influence the agroeconomic value of peach varieties. Genomic Selection (GS) can accelerate peach yield and quality gain if predictions show higher levels of accuracy compared to phenotypic selection. The available IPSC 9K SNP array V1 allows standardized and highly reliable genotyping, preparing the ground for GS in peach.ResultsA repeatability model (multiple records per individual plant) for genome-enabled predictions in eleven European peach populations is presented. The analysis included 1147 individuals derived from both commercial and non-commercial peach or peach-related accessions. Considered traits were average fruit weight (FW), sugar content (SC) and titratable acidity (TA). Plants were genotyped with the 9K IPSC array, grown in three countries (France, Italy, Spain) and phenotyped for 3–5 years. An analysis of imputation accuracy of missing genotypic data was conducted using the software Beagle, showing that two of the eleven populations were highly sensitive to increasing levels of missing data. The regression model produced, for each trait and each population, estimates of heritability (FW:0.35, SC:0.48, TA:0.53, on average) and repeatability (FW:0.56, SC:0.63, TA:0.62, on average). Predictive ability was estimated in a five-fold cross validation scheme within population as the correlation of true and predicted phenotypes. Results differed by populations and traits, but predictive abilities were in general high (FW:0.60, SC:0.72, TA:0.65, on average).ConclusionsThis study assessed the feasibility of Genomic Selection in peach for highly polygenic traits linked to yield and fruit quality. The accuracy of imputing missing genotypes was as high as 96%, and the genomic predictive ability was on average 0.65, but could be as high as 0.84 for fruit weight or 0.83 for titratable acidity. The estimated repeatability may prove very useful in the management of the typical long cycles involved in peach productions. All together, these results are very promising for the application of genomic selection to peach breeding programmes.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2017

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202311101136436ZK.pdf 1358KB PDF download
Fig. 1 207KB Image download
Fig. 1 221KB Image download
Fig. 1 753KB Image download
Fig. 3 240KB Image download
12951_2015_155_Article_IEq44.gif 1KB Image download
MediaObjects/12888_2023_5279_MOESM1_ESM.pdf 517KB PDF download
Fig. 5 404KB Image download
Fig. 4 242KB Image download
Fig. 3 1711KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

12951_2015_155_Article_IEq44.gif

Fig. 3

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  • [48]
  • [49]
  • [50]
  • [51]
  • [52]
  • [53]
  • [54]
  • [55]
  • [56]
  • [57]
  • [58]
  • [59]
  • [60]
  • [61]
  • [62]
  • [63]
  • [64]
  • [65]
  • [66]
  • [67]
  • [68]
  • [69]
  • [70]
  • [71]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:33次 浏览次数:3次