A systematic review of the effectiveness of alternative cadres in community based rehabilitation

Human Resources for Health

Review

Malcolm MacLachlan¹  Hasheem Mannan¹  Camille Boostrom¹  Eilish McAuliffe²  Chapal Khasnabis³  Neeru Gupta⁴ 

[1] Centre for Global Health & School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland;Centre for Global Health and School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland;Disability and Rehabilitation Team, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland;Health Workforce Information and Governance, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland;

关键词: Health workers;    Alternative cadres;    Community based rehabilitation;    Systematic review;   

DOI  :  10.1186/1478-4491-10-20

 received in 2011-06-02, accepted in 2012-06-13,  发布年份 2012

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundThe Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) aim to improve population health and the quality and dignity of people’s lives, but their achievement is constrained by the crisis in human resources for health. An important potential contribution towards achieving the MDGs for persons with disabilities will be the newly developed Guidelines for Community Based Rehabilitation (CBR), launched in 2010. Given the global shortage of medical and nursing personnel and highly skilled rehabilitation practitioners, effective implementation of the CBR guidelines will require additional health workers, with improved distribution and a new skill set, allowing them to work across the health, education, livelihoods, social, and development sectors.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review to evaluate existing evidence regarding the effectiveness of alternative cadres working in CBR in low and middle income countries. We searched the following databases: PUBMED, LILACS, SCIE, ISMEAR, WHOLIS, AFRICAN MED IND. We also searched the online archive of the Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal (available from 2002 to 2010), which was not covered by any of the other databases. There was no limit set on inclusion with regard to how recent a publication was in the general search.ResultsThe search yielded 235 abstracts, only 6 of which addressed CBR through some type of evaluative component. Three of the studies explored the effects of CBR interventions, mainly related to physical disabilities, while three explored issues concerned with the work performance of rehabilitation workers. Altogether the studies covered four different countries.ConclusionAll six studies related to specific service delivery in local contexts, using outcome measures that were not comparable across studies. We do not, therefore, feel that the current results provide adequate methodology or evidence for reliably generalizing their results. Due to the dearth of evidence regarding the effectiveness of alternative cadres in CBR, systematic research is needed on the training, performance and impacts of rehabilitation workers, including their capability of working across sectors and engaging with and making use of health systems research.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   
© Mannan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012. This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.