期刊论文详细信息
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Rasch analysis of the Meaning in Life Questionnaire among adults from South Africa, Australia, and New Zealand
Research
Lusilda Schutte1  Marié P. Wissing1  Dianne A. Vella-Brodrick2  Paul E. Jose3  Suria M. Ellis4 
[1] Africa Unit for Trans-disciplinary Health Research, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa;Melbourne Graduate School of Education, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia;School of Psychology, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand;Statistical Consultation Services, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa;
关键词: Rasch modelling;    Meaning in Life Questionnaire;    Eudaimonic well-being;    Psychometric properties;    Modern psychometrics;    Item response theory;    Positive psychology;    Quality of life;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12955-016-0414-x
 received in 2015-08-13, accepted in 2016-01-14,  发布年份 2016
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundMeaning in life is a key indicator of subjective well-being and quality of life. Further developments in understanding and enhancing the construct will depend inter alia on the sound measurement thereof. This study is at the forefront of applying modern psychometric techniques to the Meaning in Life Questionnaire, a scale widely used to assess meaning in life.MethodThe Rasch rating scale model was applied to the Presence and Search subscales of the Meaning in Life Questionnaire using a sample of 601 adults from South Africa, Australia, and New Zealand.ResultsThe Presence subscale was insensitive at high levels of presence of meaning while the majority of the respondents fell in that range. Removal of item 9 (“My life has no clear purpose”) and collapsing the response categories indicative of low and medium levels of the latent construct significantly improved the subscale’s targeting and fit to the Rasch model, resulting in a subscale that exhibited differential item functioning on items 1 (“I understand my life’s meaning”), 4 (“My life has a clear sense of purpose”), and 5 (“I have a good sense of what makes my life meaningful”) for country, but none for gender, age group, or education level. The Search subscale yielded disordered category threshold calibrations, but after collapsing some of the response categories representing low and medium levels of the target construct, a subscale that demonstrated good fit to the Rasch model, good targeting, and no differential item functioning resulted.ConclusionsIn terms of this particular scale, adaptation of the rating scale and removal of item 9 is recommended. Country-level parameter estimates may be needed for items that exhibited differential item functioning. The study also has significant implications for the theory, measurement, and practice of meaning in and quality of life in general. Reasons for and the far-reaching implications of the insensitivity of the Presence subscale for high levels of presence of meaning on, for example, the correlation between meaning in life and indicators of health are contemplated. Further investigation of the construct’s nature and measurement, especially at high levels, is indicated.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© Schutte et al. 2016

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202311100529087ZK.pdf 1120KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  • [48]
  • [49]
  • [50]
  • [51]
  • [52]
  • [53]
  • [54]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:2次 浏览次数:1次