Purchasing and Using Personal Emergency Response Systems (PERS): how decisions are made by community-dwelling seniors in Canada

BMC Geriatrics

Research Article

Richard Crilly¹  Alexandra C. McKenna²  Marita Kloseck³  Jan Polgar⁴ 

[1] Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, The University of Western Ontario, Parkwood Hospital, 801 Commissioners Road East, N6C 5 J1, London, ON, Canada;Graduate Program in Health and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Western Ontario, 1151 Richmond Street North, N6A 5B9, London, ON, Canada;School of Health Studies, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Western Ontario, HSB 222, Arthur and Sonia Labatt Health Sciences Building, 1151 Richmond Street North, N6A 5B9, London, ON, Canada;School of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, Room 2549, Elborn College, 1201 Western Road, N6G 1H1, London, ON, Canada;

关键词: Personal emergency response systems;    Grounded theory;    Decision-making process;    Oldest-old;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12877-015-0079-z

 received in 2014-02-12, accepted in 2015-06-28,  发布年份 2015

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundAs the demographic of older people continues to grow, health services that support independence among community-dwelling seniors have become increasingly important. Personal Emergency Response Systems (PERS) are medical alert systems, designed to serve as a safety net for seniors living alone. Health care professionals often recommend that seniors in danger of falls or other medical emergencies obtain a PERS. The purpose of the study was to investigate the experience of seniors living with and using a PERS in their daily lives, using a qualitative grounded theory approach.MethodsFive focus groups and 10 semi-structured interviews, with a total of 30 participants, were completed using a grounded theory approach. All participants were PERS subscribers over the age of 80, living alone in a naturally occurring retirement community (NORC) with high health service utilization in a major urban centre in Ontario. Constant comparative analysis was used to develop themes and ultimately a model of why and how seniors obtain and use the PERS.ResultsTwo core themes, unpredictability and decision-making around PERS activation, emerged as major features of the theoretical model. Being able to get help and the psychological value of PERS informed the context of living with a PERS.ConclusionsA number of theoretical conclusions related to unpredictability and the decision-making process around activating PERS were generated.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   
© McKenna et al. 2015. This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.