期刊论文详细信息
BMC Cancer
Validation of the flemish CARES, a quality of life and needs assessment tool for cancer care
Research Article
Elke Van Hoof1  Frank Buntinx2  Patrick Vankrunkelsven3  Bojoura Schouten4  Johan Hellings5  Ward Schrooten6  Dominique Vandijck7  Jeroen Mebis8  Paul Bulens9 
[1]Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Faculty of Psychological and Educational Sciences, Free University of Brussels, Pleinlaan 2, 1050, Elsene, Belgium
[2]Department of Public health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, PB 7001, Kapucijnenvoer 33, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
[3]Department of Public health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, PB 7001, Kapucijnenvoer 33, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
[4]Belgian Center for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBAM), Kapucijnenvoer 33-blok J, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
[5]Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Martelarenlaan 42, 3500, Hasselt, Belgium
[6]Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Martelarenlaan 42, 3500, Hasselt, Belgium
[7]AZ Delta, Rode-Kruisstraat 20, 8800, Roeselare, Belgium
[8]Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Martelarenlaan 42, 3500, Hasselt, Belgium
[9]Centre Hospitalier de Cayenne, B.P 6006, Rue des Flamboyants, 97306, Cayenne Cedex, France
[10]Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Martelarenlaan 42, 3500, Hasselt, Belgium
[11]Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
[12]ICURO, Guimardstraat 1, 1040, Brussel, Belgium
[13]Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Martelarenlaan 42, 3500, Hasselt, Belgium
[14]Jessaziekenhuis, Stadsomvaart 11, 3500, Hasselt, Belgium
[15]Jessaziekenhuis, Stadsomvaart 11, 3500, Hasselt, Belgium
关键词: Cancer;    Psycho-oncology;    Psychosocial;    Quality of life;    Needs assessment;    Validation;    CARES;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12885-016-2728-9
 received in 2015-07-13, accepted in 2016-08-17,  发布年份 2016
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】
BackgroundThe Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation System (CARES) is a quality of life (QOL) and needs assessment instrument of US origin that was developed in the 90’s. Since November 2012 the copyright and user fee were abolished and the instrument became publicly available the present study aims to reinvestigate the psychometric properties of the CARES for the Flemish population in Belgium.MethodsThe CARES was translated into Flemish following a translation-back translation process. A sample of 192 cancer patients completed the CARES, concurrent measures, and questions on socio-demographic and medical data. Participants were asked to complete the CARES a second time 1 week later, followed by some questions on their experiences with the instrument. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, content validity, construct validity, concurrent validity and feasibility of the CARES were subsequently assessed.ResultsThe Flemish CARES version demonstrated excellent reliability with high internal consistency (range .87–.96) and test-retest ratings (range .70–.91) for all summary scales. Factor analysis replicated the original factor solution of five higher order factors with factor loadings of .325–.851. Correlations with other instruments ranging from |.43|–|.75| confirmed concurrent validity. Feasibility was indicated by the low number of missing items (mean 2.3; SD 5.0) and positive feedback of participants on the instrument.ConclusionsThe Flemish CARES has strong psychometric properties and can as such be a valid tool to assess cancer patients’ QOL and needs in research, for example in international comparisons. The positive feedback of participants on the CARES support the usefulness of this tool for systematic assessment of cancer patients’ well-being and care needs in clinical practice.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02282696 (July 16, 2014).
【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s). 2016

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202311099134839ZK.pdf 906KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  • [48]
  • [49]
  • [50]
  • [51]
  • [52]
  • [53]
  • [54]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:3次