Effectiveness of psychoeducation in reducing sickness absence and improving mental health in individuals at risk of having a mental disorder: a randomised controlled trial

BMC Public Health

Research Article

Chris Jensen¹  Ellen A. Nohr²  Hans Jørgen Søgaard³  Pernille Pedersen⁴  Merete Labriola⁵ 

[1] Department of Public Health and General Practice, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway;National Centre for Occupational Rehabilitation, Rauland, Norway;Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark;Psychiatric Research Unit West, Regional Psychiatric Services West, Central Denmark Region, Gl. Landevej 49, 7400, Herning, Denmark;Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark;Psychiatric Research Unit West, Regional Psychiatric Services West, Central Denmark Region, Gl. Landevej 49, 7400, Herning, Denmark;Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark;Public Health and Quality Improvement, Central Denmark Region, Aarhus, Denmark;Public Health and Quality Improvement, Central Denmark Region, Aarhus, Denmark;Section of Clinical Social Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Public Health, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark;

关键词: Sickness absence;    Psychoeducation;    Mental health;    Return to work;    Psychological symptoms;    Mental health-related quality of life;    Locus of control;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12889-015-2087-5

 received in 2015-02-25, accepted in 2015-07-24,  发布年份 2015

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of psychoeducation on return to work as an adjunct to standard case management in individuals on sick leave at risk of having a mental disorder. The participants could have different diagnoses but were all at risk of having a mental disorder.MethodsBetween 2012 and 2014, 430 participants on sick leave were randomly allocated to either an intervention or control group. The psychoeducation consisted of 2-h sessions once a week for 6 weeks. The sessions focused on stress and work life and was based on problem-solving techniques and coping strategies. The main outcome, the relative risk (RR) of a full return to work based on register data from the job centres, was determined during the first 3 and 6 months after participation in the psychoeducation programme. At baseline and at 3 and 6 months after the intervention, the participants received a questionnaire on psychological symptoms, mental health-related quality of life, and locus of control.ResultsDuring the first 6 months after inclusion, the two groups had almost the same RR of a full return to work (RR:0.97, 95 % CI: 0.78;1.21), but during the first 3 months, the individuals in the intervention group had a significantly higher risk of not having fully returned to work (RR:0.68, 95 % CI:0.47;0.98). The individuals in the intervention group who had participated in at least four of the six psychoeducational sessions returned to work considerably slower at both time points than did the control group. The intervention did not decrease the level of psychological symptoms or improve mental health-related quality of life; however, individuals in the intervention group improved their scores on internal locus of control at both 3 and 6 months.ConclusionOffering psychoeducation to individuals on sick leave at risk of having a mental disorder had no influence on the chance of a full return to work during the first 6 months; however, it did result in a higher relative risk of not returning to work after 3 months. Therefore, we do not recommend offering psychoeducation in this form to facilitate return to work.Trial registrationClinical Trial.gov NCT01637363. Registered 6 July 2012.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© Pedersen et al. 2015