Sanitation investments in Ghana: An ethnographic investigation of the role of tenure security, land ownership and livelihoods

BMC Public Health

Research Article

F. Konradsen¹  T. Rheinländer¹  K. Senah²  J. Awunyo-Akaba³  Y. Awunyo-Akaba⁴  M. Gyapong⁵ 

[1] Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark;Department of Sociology, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana;Future Generations International (FUGI), Ho, Ghana;School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana;Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark;School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana;Dodowa Health Research Center, Ghana Health Services, Dodowa, Ghana;

关键词: Ethnicity;    Ghana;    Land ownership;    Livelihoods;    Political power;    Sanitation investments;    Sanitation infrastructure;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12889-016-3283-7

 received in 2015-01-09, accepted in 2016-07-09,  发布年份 2016

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundGhana’s low investment in household sanitation is evident from the low rates of improved sanitation. This study analysed how land ownership, tenancy security and livelihood patterns are related to sanitation investments in three adjacent rural and peri-urban communities in a district close to Accra, Ghana’s capital.MethodsQualitative data was gathered for this comparative ethnographic study over seven months, (June, 2011-January, 2012) using an average of 43 (bi-weekly) participant observation per community and 56 in-depth interviews. Detailed observational data from study communities were triangulated with multiple interview material and contextual knowledge on social structures, history of settlement, land use, livelihoods, and access to and perceptions about sanitation.ResultsThis study shows that the history of settlement and land ownership issues are highly correlated with people’s willingness and ability to invest in household sanitation across all communities. The status of being a stranger i.e. migrant in the area left some populations without rights over the land they occupied and with low incentives to invest in sanitation, while indigenous communities were challenged by the increasing appropriation of their land for commercial enterprises and for governmental development projects. Interview responses suggest that increasing migrant population and the high demand for housing in the face of limited available space has resulted in general unwillingness and inability to establish private sanitation facilities in the communities. The increasing population has also created high demand for cheap accommodation, pushing tenants to accept informal tenancy agreements that provided for poor sanitation facilities. In addition, poor knowledge of tenancy rights leaves tenants in no position to demand sanitation improvements and therefore landlords feel no obligation or motivation to provide and maintain domestic sanitation facilities.ConclusionsThe study states that poor land rights, the history of settlements, in-migration and insecure tenancy are key components that are associated with local livelihoods and investments in private sanitation in rapidly changing rural and peri-urban communities of Ghana. Sanitation policy makers and programme managers must acknowledge that these profound local, ethnic and economic forces are shaping people’s abilities and motivations for sanitation investments.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© Awunyo-Akaba et al. 2016