| BMC Public Health | |
| Determinants of self-rated health among shanghai elders: a cross-sectional study | |
| Research Article | |
| Weizhen Dong1  Jin Wan2  Ge Bai2  Yanjun Xu2  Lyuying Fang2  Anjiang Sun2  Ying Wang2  Chun Chen3  Yinghua Yang4  | |
| [1] Department of Sociology and Legal Studies, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, N2L 3G1, Waterloo, ON, Canada;Research Institute of Health Development Strategies, Fudan University, 130 Dong An Road, 200032, Shanghai, China;School of Humanities and Management, Wenzhou Medical College, 325035, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China;Wenzhou Medical University Chashan Campus, Chashan University Town, Tongren Building 7B302, 325035, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China;Shanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control & Prevention, yangyinghua@scdc.sh.cn, No. 1380 Zhongshan West Road, 200336, Shanghai, China; | |
| 关键词: Self-rated Health; Elders; Health Status; Shanghai; | |
| DOI : 10.1186/s12889-017-4718-5 | |
| received in 2016-10-20, accepted in 2017-09-06, 发布年份 2017 | |
| 来源: Springer | |
PDF
|
|
【 摘 要 】
BackgroundAs the most populous nation in the world, China has now becoming an emerging ageing society. Shanghai is the first city facing the challenge of ageing demographics. Against this background, a study that employs self-rated health (SRH) assessment system was designed to explore the health status of Shanghai elders, and learn their attitudes toward health issues; as well as to investigate the determinants of SRH among Shanghai elders. Understanding SRH is crucial for finding appropriate solutions that could effectively tackle the increasing eldercare demand.MethodsThis study adopted a quantitative research strategy. Using a multistage stratified cluster sampling method, we conducted a questionnaire survey in August 2011 in Shanghai, which collected 2001 valid survey responses. SRH assessments were categorized by five levels: very good, fairly good, average, fairly poor, or poor. The respondents’ functional status was evaluated using the Barthel index of activities for daily living. In the data analysis, we used chi-squared test to determine differences in socio-demographic characteristics among various groups. Along with statistics, several logistic regression models were designed to determine the associations between internal influence factors and SRH.ResultsYounger age (χ2 = 27.5, p < 0.05), male sex (χ2 = 11.5, p < 0.1), and living in the suburbs (χ2 = 55.1, p < 0.05) were associated with better SRH scores. Higher SRH scores were also linked with health behaviour of the respondents; namely, do not smoke (χ2 = 18.0, p < 0.1), do not drink (χ2 = 18.6, p < 0.1), or engage in regular outdoor activities (χ2 = 69.3, p < 0.05). The respondents with better social support report higher SRH scores than those without. Respondents’ ability to hear (χ2 = 38.7, p < 0.05), speak (χ2 = 16.1, p < 0.05) and see (χ2 = 78.3, p < 0.05) impacted their SRH scores as well. Meanwhile, chronic illness except asthma was a major influence factor in low SRH score. Applying multiple regression models, a series of determinants were analysed to establish the extent to which they contribute to SRH. The impact of these variables on SRH scores were 6.6% from socio-demographic and health risk behaviours, 2.4% from social support, 8.5% from mental health, 20% from physical conditions, and13% from chronic diseases.ConclusionsThis is the first study that examines the determinants of SRH among Shanghai elders. Nearly 40% of our study’s respondents reported their health status as “good”. The main determinants of SRH among elders include living condition, health risk behaviour, social support, health status, and the economic status of the neighbourhood.
【 授权许可】
CC BY
© The Author(s). 2017
【 预 览 】
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
| RO202311098021381ZK.pdf | 425KB |
【 参考文献 】
- [1]
- [2]
- [3]
- [4]
- [5]
- [6]
- [7]
- [8]
- [9]
- [10]
- [11]
- [12]
- [13]
- [14]
- [15]
- [16]
- [17]
- [18]
- [19]
- [20]
- [21]
- [22]
- [23]
- [24]
- [25]
- [26]
- [27]
- [28]
- [29]
- [30]
- [31]
- [32]
- [33]
- [34]
- [35]
- [36]
- [37]
- [38]
- [39]
- [40]
- [41]
- [42]
- [43]
- [44]
- [45]
- [46]
- [47]
- [48]
- [49]
- [50]
- [51]
- [52]
- [53]
- [54]
- [55]
PDF