Molecular circumscription and major evolutionary lineages of the fern genus Dryopteris (Dryopteridaceae)

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Research Article

Emily B Sessa¹  Atsushi Ebihara²  Shi-Yong Dong³  Xin-Fen Gao⁴  Liang Zhang⁴  Li-Bing Zhang⁵ 

[1] Botany Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 430 Lincoln Drive, 53706-1313, Madison, Wisconsin, USA;Department of Botany, National Museum of Nature and Science, 305-0005, Tsukuba-shi, Ibaraki, Japan;South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 510650, Guangzhou, P.R. China;The ECORES Lab, Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 416, 610041, Chengdu, Sichuan, P. R China;The ECORES Lab, Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 416, 610041, Chengdu, Sichuan, P. R China;Missouri Botanical Garden, P.O. Box 299, 63166-0299, St. Louis, Missouri, USA;

关键词: Maximum Parsimony;    rbcL;    rbcL Gene;    trnL Intron;    Plastid Region;   

DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2148-12-180

 received in 2012-06-26, accepted in 2012-09-04,  发布年份 2012

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundThe fern genus Dryopteris (Dryopteridaceae) is among the most common and species rich fern genera in temperate forests in the northern hemisphere containing 225–300 species worldwide. The circumscription of Dryopteris has been controversial and various related genera have, over the time, been included in and excluded from Dryopteris. The infrageneric phylogeny has largely remained unclear, and the placement of the majority of the supraspecific taxa of Dryopteris has never been tested using molecular data.ResultsIn this study, DNA sequences of four plastid loci (rbcL gene, rps4-trnS spacer, trnL intron, trnL-F spacer) were used to reconstruct the phylogeny of Dryopteris. A total of 122 accessions are sampled in our analysis and they represent 100 species of the expanded Dryopteris including Acrophorus, Acrorumohra, Diacalpe, Dryopsis, Nothoperanema, and Peranema. All four subgenera and 19 sections currently recognized in Dryopteris s.s. are included. One species each of Arachniodes, Leptorumohra, and Lithostegia of Dryopteridaceae are used as outgroups. Our study confirms the paraphyly of Dryopteris and provides the first strong molecular evidence on the monophyly of Acrophorus, Diacalpe, Dryopsis, Nothoperanema, and Peranema. However, all these monophyletic groups together with the paraphyletic Acrorumohra are suggested to be merged into Dryopteris based on both molecular and morphological evidence. Our analysis identified 13 well-supported monophyletic groups. Each of the 13 clades is additionally supported by morphological synapomophies and is inferred to represent a major evolutionary lineage in Dryopteris. In contrast, monophyly of the four subgenera and 15 out of 19 sections currently recognized in Dryopteris s.s is not supported by plastid data.ConclusionsThe genera, Acrophorus, Acrorumohra, Diacalpe, Dryopsis, Nothoperanema, and Peranema, should all be merged into Dryopteris. Most species of these genera share a short rhizome and catadromic arrangement of frond segments, unlike the sister genus of Dryopteris s.l., Arachniodes, which has anadromic arrangement of frond segments. The non-monophyly of the 19 out of the 21 supraspecific taxa (sections, subgenera) in Dryopteris strongly suggests that the current taxonomy of this genus is in need of revision. The disagreement between the previous taxonomy and molecular results in Dryopteris may be due partly to interspecific hybridization and polyplodization. More morphological studies and molecular data, especially from the nuclear genome, are needed to thoroughly elucidate the evolutionary history of Dryopteris. The 13 well-supported clades identified based on our data represent 13 major evolutionary lineages in Dryopteris that are also supported by morphological synapomophies.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© Zhang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012