期刊论文详细信息
BMC Evolutionary Biology
Phylogenomic analysis of carangimorph fishes reveals flatfish asymmetry arose in a blink of the evolutionary eye
Research Article
W. Leo Smith1  Brant C. Faircloth2  Richard C. Harrington3  Matt Friedman4  Thomas J. Near5  Michael E. Alfaro6  Ron I. Eytan7 
[1] Biodiversity Institute and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, 66045, Lawrence, KS, USA;Department of Biological Sciences and Museum of Natural Science, Louisiana State University, 70803, Baton Rouge, LA, USA;Department of Earth Sciences, University of Oxford, OX1 3AN, Oxford, UK;Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology and Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, 06520, New Haven, CT, USA;Department of Earth Sciences, University of Oxford, OX1 3AN, Oxford, UK;Museum of Paleontology and Department of Earth and Environmental Science, University of Michigan, 1109 Geddes Ave, 48109-1079, Ann Arbor, MI, USA;Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology and Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, 06520, New Haven, CT, USA;Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Los Angeles, 90095, Los Angeles, CA, USA;Department of Marine Biology, Texas A&M University at Galveston, 77553, Galveston, TX, USA;
关键词: Adaptive radiation;    Carangimorpha;    Evolutionary innovation;    Pleuronectiformes;    UCE;    Ultraconserved elements;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12862-016-0786-x
 received in 2016-07-12, accepted in 2016-09-30,  发布年份 2016
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundFlatfish cranial asymmetry represents one of the most remarkable morphological innovations among vertebrates, and has fueled vigorous debate on the manner and rate at which strikingly divergent phenotypes evolve. A surprising result of many recent molecular phylogenetic studies is the lack of support for flatfish monophyly, where increasingly larger DNA datasets of up to 23 loci have either yielded a weakly supported flatfish clade or indicated the group is polyphyletic. Lack of resolution for flatfish relationships has been attributed to analytical limitations for dealing with processes such as nucleotide non-stationarity and incomplete lineage sorting (ILS). We tackle this phylogenetic problem using a sequence dataset comprising more than 1,000 ultraconserved DNA element (UCE) loci covering 45 carangimorphs, the broader clade containing flatfishes and several other specialized lineages such as remoras, billfishes, and archerfishes.ResultsWe present a phylogeny based on UCE loci that unequivocally supports flatfish monophyly and a single origin of asymmetry. We document similar levels of discordance among UCE loci as in previous, smaller molecular datasets. However, relationships among flatfishes and carangimorphs recovered from multilocus concatenated and species tree analyses of our data are robust to the analytical framework applied and size of data matrix used. By integrating the UCE data with a rich fossil record, we find that the most distinctive carangimorph bodyplans arose rapidly during the Paleogene (66.0–23.03 Ma). Flatfish asymmetry, for example, likely evolved over an interval of no more than 2.97 million years.ConclusionsThe longstanding uncertainty in phylogenetic hypotheses for flatfishes and their carangimorph relatives highlights the limitations of smaller molecular datasets when applied to successive, rapid divergences. Here, we recovered significant support for flatfish monophyly and relationships among carangimorphs through analysis of over 1,000 UCE loci. The resulting time-calibrated phylogeny points to phenotypic divergence early within carangimorph history that broadly matches with the predictions of adaptive models of lineage diversification.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s). 2016

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202311098006956ZK.pdf 1784KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  • [48]
  • [49]
  • [50]
  • [51]
  • [52]
  • [53]
  • [54]
  • [55]
  • [56]
  • [57]
  • [58]
  • [59]
  • [60]
  • [61]
  • [62]
  • [63]
  • [64]
  • [65]
  • [66]
  • [67]
  • [68]
  • [69]
  • [70]
  • [71]
  • [72]
  • [73]
  • [74]
  • [75]
  • [76]
  • [77]
  • [78]
  • [79]
  • [80]
  • [81]
  • [82]
  • [83]
  • [84]
  • [85]
  • [86]
  • [87]
  • [88]
  • [89]
  • [90]
  • [91]
  • [92]
  • [93]
  • [94]
  • [95]
  • [96]
  • [97]
  • [98]
  • [99]
  • [100]
  • [101]
  • [102]
  • [103]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:2次 浏览次数:0次