| BMC Cancer | |
| Efficacy and safety of weekly nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in Chinese patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: a phase II study | |
| Research Article | |
| Jianming Xu1  Damir Begic2  Mingyu Li2  Brian Lu2  Guanghai Dai3  Xianjun Yu4  Yanqiao Zhang5  Shujun Yang6  Jia Chen7  Lin Shen8  Liwei Wang9  Hongming Pan1,10  Ruihua Xu1,11  Jihui Hao1,12  Guohong Han1,13  Jieer Ying1,14  | |
| [1] 307 Hospital of the People’s Liberation Army, 100021, Beijing, China;Celgene Corporation, Summit, NJ, USA;Chinese People’s Liberation Army General Hospital No.28, Fuxing Road, Beijing, China;Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No 270, Dongan Road, 200032, Shanghai, China;Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Haping Road No.150, Harbin, China;Henan Cancer Hospital, 450003, Zhengzhou, China;Jiangsu Provincial Tumor Hospital, 300 Guangzhou Road, 210029, Nanjing, China;Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, 100142, Beijing, China;Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, 100142, Beijing, China;Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, 160 Pujian Lu, 200127, Shanghai, China;Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, 3 East Qingchun Road, 310016, Hangzhou City, China;Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng East Road, 510060, Guangzhou, China;Tianjin Cancer Hospital, Huan-Hu-Xi Road, 300060, Tianjin, China;Xijing Hospital, W Rd, Xi’an, 127, Changle, China;Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, 38 Guangji Road, Banshan Bridge, 310022, Hangzhou City, China; | |
| 关键词: nab; Gemcitabine; MPACT; Pancreatic cancer; Metastatic; Chinese; | |
| DOI : 10.1186/s12885-017-3887-z | |
| received in 2016-08-19, accepted in 2017-12-08, 发布年份 2017 | |
| 来源: Springer | |
PDF
|
|
【 摘 要 】
BackgroundThis phase II bridging study assessed the safety and efficacy of nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine (Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Clinical Trial [MPACT] regimen) in Chinese patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC).MethodsThis 3-part sequential study evaluated nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks. Part 1 evaluated safety. Part 2 evaluated efficacy using Simon’s optimal 2-stage design: if >2 responses were observed in Stage 1 (n = 28), 54 additional patients would be enrolled in Stage 2. If >9 responses were observed, the study was complete. Otherwise, nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine would be compared with gemcitabine alone in Part 3. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), overall survival (OS), and safety.ResultsEighty-three patients were treated. The prespecified primary endpoint was met: the independently assessed ORR in Stages 1 + 2 was 35% (95% CI, 24.8–46.2); therefore, Part 3 was not initiated. The median DOR was 8.9 months (95% CI, 6.01–8.94). The median OS and progression-free survival were 9.2 (95% CI, 7.6–11.1) and 5.5 (95% CI, 5.29–7.16) months, respectively. The 12-month OS rate was 30%. In an updated analysis, the median OS was 9.3 months and the 12-month OS rate was 32%. Longer OS was observed in patients with baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio ≤ 5 vs > 5. The most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events were leukopenia (35%), neutropenia (34%), anemia (15%), thrombocytopenia (10%), and fatigue (13%). Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy occurred in 7% of patients (no grade 4 reported).ConclusionsThe MPACT regimen of nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine is efficacious in Chinese patients with MPC. No new safety signals were observed.Trial registrationNCT02135822, May 8, 2014.
【 授权许可】
CC BY
© The Author(s). 2017
【 预 览 】
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
| RO202311097828496ZK.pdf | 481KB |
【 参考文献 】
- [1]
- [2]
- [3]
- [4]
- [5]
- [6]
- [7]
- [8]
- [9]
- [10]
- [11]
- [12]
- [13]
- [14]
- [15]
- [16]
- [17]
- [18]
- [19]
- [20]
- [21]
PDF