Cost-utility analysis of Palivizumab for Respiratory Syncytial Virus infection prophylaxis in preterm infants: update based on the clinical evidence in Spain

BMC Infectious Diseases

Research Article

J. Figueras-Aloy¹  X. Carbonell-Estrany²  F. Martinón-Torres³  M. Sanchez-Luna⁴  M. Sánchez-Solís⁵  R. Burgos-Pol⁶  I. Oyagüez⁶ 

[1] Hospital Clinic, Catedratic de Pediatria, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain;Hospital Clinic, Institut d’Investigacions Biomediques August Pi Suñer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain;Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain;Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain;Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain;Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research Iberia (PORIB), Paseo Joaquín Rodrigo 4-I, Pozuelo de Alarcón, 28224, Madrid, Spain;

关键词: Cost-effectiveness;    Preterm infants;    Palivizumab;    RSV infection;    Recurrent wheezing;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12879-017-2803-0

 received in 2017-02-07, accepted in 2017-10-06,  发布年份 2017

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundThis study aimed at estimating the efficiency of palivizumab in the prevention of Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) infection and its sequelae in preterm infants (32day 1-35day 0weeks of gestational age –wGA-) in Spain.MethodsA decision-tree model was developed to compare health benefits (Quality Adjusted Life Years-QALYs) and costs of palivizumab versus a non-prophylaxis strategy over 6 years. A hypothetical cohort of 1,000 preterm infants, 32day 1-35day 0 wGA (4.356 kg average weight) at the beginning of the prophylaxis (15 mg/kg of palivizumab; 3.88 average number of injections per RSV season) was analysed.The model considered the most recent evidence from Spanish observational and epidemiological studies on RSV infection: the FLIP II study provided hospital admission and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission rates; in-hospital mortality rate was drawn from an epidemiological study from 2004 to 2012; recurrent wheezing rates associated to RSV infection from SPRING study were adjusted by the evidence on the palivizumab effect from clinical trials. Quality of life baseline value, number of hospitalized infants and the presence of recurrent wheezing over time were granted to estimate QALYs.National Health Service and societal perspective (included also recurrent wheezing indirect cost) were analysed. Total costs (€, 2016) included pharmaceutical and administration costs, hospitalization costs and recurrent wheezing management annual costs. A discount rate of 3.0% was applied annually for both costs and health outcomes.ResultsOver 6 years, the base case analysis showed that palivizumab was associated to an increase of 0.0731 QALYs compared to non-prophylaxis. Total costs were estimated in €2,110.71 (palivizumab) and €671.68 (non-prophylaxis) from the National Health System (NHS) perspective, resulting in an incremental cost utility ratio (ICUR) of €19,697.69/QALYs gained (prophylaxis vs non-prophylaxis). Results derived from the risk-factors population subgroups analysed were in line with the total population results. From the societal perspective, the incremental cost associated to palivizumab decreased to an €1,253.14 (ICUR = €17,153.16€/QALYs gained for palivizumab vs non-prophylaxis). One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the model.ConclusionsThe prophylaxis with palivizumab is efficient for preventing from RSV infections in preterm infants 32day 1-35day 0 wGA in Spain.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s). 2017