期刊论文详细信息
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Comparison of the PEEK cage and an autologous cage made from the lumbar spinous process and laminae in posterior lumbar interbody fusion
Research Article
Bin Lin1  Hui Yu1  Wenbin Zhang1  Zhida Chen1  Zhuanzhi Huang1 
[1] Department of Orthopaedics, the 175th Hospital of PLA, Southeast Hospital of Xiamen University, 269 Zhanghua Road, 363000, Zhangzhou, Fujian, People’s Republic of China;
关键词: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF);    PEEK cage;    Spinous process;    Lumbar degenerative disease;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12891-016-1237-y
 received in 2014-06-28, accepted in 2016-04-19,  发布年份 2016
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundA prospective cohort study was performed to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes following posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in patients treated with a PEEK cage compared to those treated with an autologous cage using the lumbar spinous process and laminae (ACSP).MethodsSixty-nine consecutive patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease were randomly assigned to either a PEEK cage (group A, n = 34) or an ACSP (group B, n = 35). Monosegmental PLIF was performed in all patients. Mean lumbar lordosis, mean disc height, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, functional outcomes, fusion rates and complication rates were recorded and compared. The patients were followed postoperatively for a minimum of 2 years.ResultsSuccessful radiographic fusion was documented in all patients. No flexion–extension hypermobility or pedicle screw loosening or breakage occurred during the follow-up period. No significant difference existed between the 2 groups when comparing the mean lumbar lordosis, mean disc height, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, functional outcomes, fusion rates or complication rates. Overall satisfactory results were achieved in both groups.ConclusionsThe results suggest that the ACSP appears to be equally as safe and effective as the PEEK cage.Trial registrationISRCTN25558534. Retrospectively registered 16/02/2016.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s). 2016

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202311096201726ZK.pdf 1215KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:1次 浏览次数:0次