Depression treatment patterns among individuals with osteoarthritis: a cross sectional study

BMC Psychiatry

Research Article

Usha Sambamoorthi¹  Parul Agarwal¹  Xiaoyun Pan¹ 

[1] School of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Systems and Policy, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA;

关键词: Arthritis;    Antidepressants;    Psychotherapy;    MEPS;    Depression treatment;   

DOI  :  10.1186/1471-244X-13-121

 received in 2012-11-05, accepted in 2013-04-09,  发布年份 2013

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundArthritis and depression often co-occur; however, studies that describe patterns of depression treatment among individuals with arthritis are scant. The purpose of the study was to examine depression treatment patterns among individuals with osteoarthritis (OA) by predisposing, enabling, need factors, personal health practices and external health environment.MethodsRetrospective cross-sectional design was used. Data were obtained from 2008 and 2010 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). The sample consisted of 647adults aged over 21 years with depression and OA. Depression treatment was categorized as: 1) No treatment;2) antidepressant use only and 3) both antidepressants and psychotherapy (combination therapy). Chi- square tests and multinomial logistic regressions were used to describe patterns of depression treatment. All analysis was performed using Statistical Analysis Software (SAS) version 9.3.ResultsOverall, 13.0% of the study sample reported no depression treatment, 67.8% used antidepressants only and 19.2% used combination therapy. Among individuals with OA significant subgroup differences in depression treatment were observed. For example, African Americans were less likely to report depression treatment compared to whites [antidepressants: AOR=0.33, 95% CI=0.21,0.51; combination therapy: AOR=0.39, 95% CI=0.23, 0.65]. Elderly adults were more likely to receive antidepressants and less likely to receive psychotherapy as compared to younger adults [AOR=0.53, 95% CI= 0.28,0.98]. Adults with anxiety were more likely to report depression treatment compared to those without anxiety [antidepressants: AOR=1.53, 95% CI=1.06, 2.22; combination therapy: AOR=3.52, 95% CI=2.40, 5.15].ConclusionFuture research needs to examine the reason for low rates of combination therapy as well as subgroup differences in combination therapy among individuals with OA.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© Agarwal et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013