Investigating young women’s motivations to engage in early mammography screening in Switzerland: results of a cross-sectional study

BMC Cancer

Research Article

Nanon H. M. Labrie¹  Peter J. Schulz²  Ramona Ludolph² 

[1]Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

[2]Institute of Communication & Health, Faculty of Communication Sciences, Università della Svizzera italiana, USI, Via G. Buffi 13, CH-6904, Lugano, Switzerland

关键词: Breast cancer;    Mammography screening;    Knowledge;    Fear;    Risk perceptions;    Ego-involvement;    Switzerland;    Women aged 30-49;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12885-017-3180-1

 received in 2015-11-20, accepted in 2017-03-08,  发布年份 2017

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundThe scientific and public debate concerning organized mammography screening is unprecedentedly strong. With research evidence concerning its efficacy being ambiguous, the recommendations pertaining to the age-thresholds for program inclusion vary between – and even within – countries. Data shows that young women who are not yet eligible for systematic screening, have opportunistic mammograms relatively often and, moreover, want to be included in organized programs. Yet, to date, little is known about the precise motivations underlying young women’s desire and intentions to go for, not medically indicated, mammographic screening.MethodsA cross-sectional online survey was carried out among women aged 30-49 years (n = 918) from Switzerland.ResultsThe findings show that high fear (β = .08, p ≤ .05), perceived susceptibility (β = .10, p ≤ .05), and ego-involvement (β = .34, p ≤ .001) are the main predictors of screening intentions among women who are not yet eligible for the systematic program. Also, geographical location (Swiss-French group: β = .15, p ≤ .001; Swiss-Italian group: β = .26, p ≤ .001) and age (β = .11, p ≤ .001) play a role. In turn, breast cancer knowledge, risk perceptions, and educational status do not have a significant impact.ConclusionsYoung women seem to differ inherently from those who are already eligible for systematic screening in terms of the factors underlying their intentions to engage in mammographic screening. Thus, when striving to promote adherence to systematic screening guidelines – whether based on unequivocal scientific evidence or policy decisions – and to allow women to make evidence-based, informed decisions about mammography, differential strategies are needed to reach different age-groups.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s). 2017