Elective cesarean section or not? Maternal age and risk of adverse outcomes at term: a population-based registry study of low-risk primiparous women

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Research Article

Rolv Skjærven¹  Kari Klungsøyr²  Lina Herstad³  Siri Vangen³  Lisa Forsén⁴  Tom Tanbo⁵  Thomas Åbyholm⁶ 

[1] Departments of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway;Medical Birth Registry of Norway, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Bergen, Norway;Medical Birth Registry of Norway, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Bergen, Norway;Departments of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway;Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Women’s Health, Women and Children’s Division, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, PO Box 4950, N-0424, Oslo, Nydalen, Norway;Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Women’s Health, Women and Children’s Division, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, PO Box 4950, N-0424, Oslo, Nydalen, Norway;Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway;University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway;Department of Gynecology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway;University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway;Department of Obstetrics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway;

关键词: Maternal age;    Low-risk population;    Delivery;    Obstetric;    Cesarean section;    Outcomes;    Pregnancy;    Adverse outcomes;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12884-016-1028-3

 received in 2014-12-15, accepted in 2016-08-15,  发布年份 2016

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundMaternal age at delivery and cesarean section rates are increasing. In older women, the decision on delivery mode may be influenced by a reported increased risk of surgical interventions during labor and complications with increasing maternal age. We examined the association between maternal age and adverse outcomes in low-risk primiparous women, and the risk of adverse outcomes by delivery modes, both planned and performed (elective and emergency cesarean section, operative vaginal delivery, and unassisted vaginal delivery) in women aged ≥ 35 years.MethodsA population-based registry study was conducted using data from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway and Statistics Norway including 169,583 low-risk primiparas with singleton, cephalic labors at ≥ 37 weeks during 1999 − 2009. Outcomes studied were obstetric blood loss, maternal transfer to intensive care units, 5-min Apgar score, and neonatal complications. We adjusted for potential confounders using relative risk models and multinomial logistic regression.ResultsMost adverse outcomes increased with increasing maternal age. However, the increase in absolute risks was low, except for moderate obstetric blood loss and transfer to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Operative deliveries increased with increasing maternal age and in women aged ≥ 35 years, the risk of maternal complications in operative delivery increased. Neonatal adverse outcomes increased mainly in emergency operative deliveries. Moderate blood loss was three times more likely in elective and emergency cesarean section than in unassisted vaginal delivery, and twice as likely in operative vaginal delivery. Low Apgar score and neonatal complications occurred two to three times more often in emergency operative deliveries than in unassisted vaginal delivery. However, comparing outcomes after elective cesarean section and planned vaginal delivery, only moderate blood loss (higher in elective cesarean section), neonatal transfer to NICU and neonatal infections (both higher in planned vaginal delivery) differed significantly.ConclusionsMost studied adverse outcomes increased with increasing maternal age, as did operative delivery. Although emergency operative procedures were associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes, the absolute risk difference in complications between the modes of delivery was low for the majority of outcomes studied.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s). 2016