期刊论文详细信息
BMC Family Practice
‘Doing the right thing’: factors influencing GP prescribing of antidepressants and prescribed doses
Research Article
Margaret Maxwell1  Chris F. Johnson2  Nadine J. Dougall3  Brian Williams3  Stephen A. MacGillivray4 
[1] Nursing Midwifery and Allied Health Professionals Research Unit, University of Stirling, Unit 13 Scion House, Stirling University Innovation Park, FK9 4NF, Stirling, UK;Pharmacy and Prescribing Support Unit, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, 2nd Floor, Main Building, West Glasgow Ambulatory Care Hospital, Dalnair Street, Yorkhill, G3 8SJ, Glasgow, UK;School of Health and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Sighthill Court, EH11 4BN, Edinburgh, UK;School of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Airlie Place, DD1 4HN, Dundee, UK;
关键词: General practice;    Primary health care;    Depression;    Antidepressive agents;    Doctor-patient relationship;    Qualitative research;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12875-017-0643-z
 received in 2017-03-02, accepted in 2017-06-05,  发布年份 2017
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundAntidepressant prescribing continues to increase, with 5-16% of adults receiving antidepressants annually. Total prescribing growth is due in part to increased long-term use, greater selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor (SSRI) use and the use of higher SSRI doses. Evidence does not support routine use of higher SSRI doses for depression treatment, and factors influencing the use of such doses are not well known. The aim of this study was to explore factors influencing GPs’ use of antidepressants and their doses to treat depression.MethodsSemi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of 28 practising GPs; sampled by antidepressant prescribing volume, practice size and deprivation level. A topic guide drawing on past literature was used with enough flexibility to allow additional themes to emerge. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Framework analysis was employed. Constant comparison and disconfirmation were carried out across transcripts, with data collection being interspersed with analysis by three researchers. The thematic framework was then systematically applied to the data and conceptualised into an overarching explanatory model.ResultsDepression treatment involved ethical and professional imperatives of ‘doing the right thing’ for individuals by striving to achieve the ‘right care fit’. This involved medicalised and non-medicalised patient-centred approaches. Factors influencing antidepressant prescribing and doses varied over time from first presentation, to antidepressant initiation and longer-term treatment. When faced with distressed patients showing symptoms of moderate to severe depression GPs were confident prescribing SSRIs which they considered as safe and effective medicines, and ethically and professionally appropriate.Many GPs were unaware that higher doses lacked greater efficacy and onset of action occurred within 1-2 weeks, preferring to wait 8-12 weeks before increasing or switching. Ongoing pressures to maintain prescribing (e.g. fear of depression recurrence), few perceived continuation problems (e.g. lack of safety concerns) and lack of proactive medication review (e.g. patients only present in crisis), all combine to further drive antidepressant prescribing growth over time.ConclusionsGPs strive to ‘do the right thing’ to help people. Antidepressants are only a single facet of depression treatment. However, increased awareness of drug limitations and regular proactive reviews may help optimise care.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s). 2017

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202311095336179ZK.pdf 1096KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  • [48]
  • [49]
  • [50]
  • [51]
  • [52]
  • [53]
  • [54]
  • [55]
  • [56]
  • [57]
  • [58]
  • [59]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:3次 浏览次数:0次