Accuracy of acute burns diagnosis made using smartphones and tablets: a questionnaire-based study among medical experts

BMC Emergency Medicine

Research Article

Lisa Blom¹  Marie Hasselberg¹  Constance Boissin¹  Lucie Laflamme²  Lee Wallis³  Nikki Allorto⁴ 

[1] Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden;Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden;University of South Africa, Institute for Social and Health Sciences, P.O. Box 1087, Lenasia, 1820, Johannesburg, South Africa;Division of Emergency Medicine, Stellenbosch University, Bellville, South Africa;Edendale Burn Services, Department of General Surgery, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa;

关键词: Image-based diagnosis;    Remote diagnosis;    mHealth;    Diagnostic accuracy;    Burns;    Handheld device;    Smartphone;    Tablet;    Acute;    Emergency;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12873-017-0151-4

 received in 2017-07-25, accepted in 2017-12-01,  发布年份 2017

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundRemote assistance for burns by medical experts can support nurses and general physicians in emergency care with diagnostic and management advice. Previous studies indicate a high diagnostic accuracy based on images viewed on a computer screen, but whether image-based analysis by experts using handheld devices is accurate remains to be determined.MethodA review of patient data from eight emergency centres in the Western Cape, South Africa, revealed 10 typical cases of burns commonly seen in children and adults. A web-based questionnaire was created with 51 images of burns representing those cases. Burns specialists from two countries (South Africa and Sweden (n = 8 and 7 respectively)) and emergency medicine specialists from South Africa (n = 11) were contacted by email and asked to assess each burn’s total body surface area (TBSA) and depth using a smartphone or tablet. The accuracy and inter-rater reliability of the assessments were measured using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), both for all cases aggregated and for paediatric and adult burn cases separately. Eight participants repeated the questionnaire on a computer and intra-rater reliability was calculated.ResultsThe assessments of TBSA are of high accuracy all specialists aggregated (ICC = 0.82 overall and 0.81 for both child and adult cases separately) and remain high for all three participant groups separately. The burn depth assessments have low accuracy all specialists aggregated, with ICCs of 0.53 overall, 0.61 for child and 0.46 for adult cases. The most accurate assessments of depth are among South African burns specialists (reaching acceptable for child cases); the other two groups’ ICCs are low in all instances. Computer-based assessments were similar to those made on handheld devices.ConclusionAs was the case for computer-based studies, burns images viewed on handheld devices may be a suitable means of seeking expert advice even with limited additional information when it comes to burn size but less so in the case of burn depth. Familiarity with the type of cases presented could facilitate image-based diagnosis of depth.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s). 2017