Genomic selection requires genomic control of inbreeding

Genetics Selection Evolution

Research

Theo HE Meuwissen¹  John A Woolliams²  Anna K Sonesson³ 

[1] Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, University of Life Sciences, Nofima, 1432, Ås, Norway;Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, University of Life Sciences, Nofima, 1432, Ås, Norway;The Roslin Institute and R(D) SVS, University of Edinburgh, Roslin, EH25 9PS, Midlothian, UK;Nofima AS, 1431, Ås, Norway;

关键词: Quantitative Trait Locus;    Single Nucleotide Polymorphism;    Genomic Selection;    Genetic Gain;    Selection Candidate;   

DOI  :  10.1186/1297-9686-44-27

 received in 2012-01-30, accepted in 2012-07-26,  发布年份 2012

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundIn the past, pedigree relationships were used to control and monitor inbreeding because genomic relationships among selection candidates were not available until recently. The aim of this study was to understand the consequences for genetic variability across the genome when genomic information is used to estimate breeding values and in managing the inbreeding generated in the course of selection on genome-enhanced estimated breeding values.MethodsThese consequences were measured by genetic gain, pedigree- and genome-based rates of inbreeding, and local inbreeding across the genome. Breeding schemes were compared by simulating truncation selection or optimum contribution selection with a restriction on pedigree- or genome-based inbreeding, and with selection using estimated breeding values based on genome- or pedigree-based BLUP. Trait information was recorded on full-sibs of the candidates.ResultsWhen the information used to estimate breeding values and to constrain rates of inbreeding were either both pedigree-based or both genome-based, rates of genomic inbreeding were close to the desired values and the identical-by-descent profiles were reasonably uniform across the genome. However, with a pedigree-based inbreeding constraint and genome-based estimated breeding values, genomic rates of inbreeding were much higher than expected. With pedigree-instead of genome-based estimated breeding values, the impact of the largest QTL on the breeding values was much smaller, resulting in a more uniform genome-wide identical-by-descent profile but genomic rates of inbreeding were still higher than expected based on pedigree relationships, because they measure the inbreeding at a neutral locus not linked to any QTL. Neutral loci did not exist here, where there were 100 QTL on each chromosome. With a pedigree-based inbreeding constraint and genome-based estimated breeding values, genomic rates of inbreeding substantially exceeded the value of its constraint. In contrast, with a genome-based inbreeding constraint and genome-based estimated breeding values, marker frequencies changed, but this change was limited by the inbreeding constraint at the marker position.ConclusionsTo control inbreeding, it is necessary to account for it on the same basis as what is used to estimate breeding values, i.e. pedigree-based inbreeding control with traditional pedigree-based BLUP estimated breeding values and genome-based inbreeding control with genome-based estimated breeding values.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© Sonesson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012