期刊论文详细信息
BMC Gastroenterology
Twenty-five years of advocacy for patients with gastroparesis: support group therapy and patient reported outcome tool development
Research Article
Sandra Holmes1  Thomas Abell2  Archana Kedar2  Mohammad K. Mohammad2  Karen Beatty2  Teresa Cutts3 
[1] Director of Nursing Education, Development and Research, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia;Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Louisville, 550 South Jackson Street, ACB A3L15, 40202, Louisville, KY, USA;Division of Public Health Science, Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA;
关键词: Gastroparesis;    Patient-reported outcomes or PROs;    Health-related quality of life;    Support groups;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12876-016-0523-3
 received in 2015-11-02, accepted in 2016-08-16,  发布年份 2016
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundGastroparesis (Gp) is a poorly understood chronic gastrointestinal medical condition for which patient reported outcomes (PRO) are lacking. Previously developed symptoms scoring has been used for several decades. Using symptoms scores as a basis for documentation, 12 years of support/focus group patient feedback from the nearly 1000 attendees were integrated with medical care and recommendations for treatment were developed. Early attenders of the support group were compared with non-attendees for illness acuity, disability, and duration and number of office phone calls.MethodsPatients cared for in an academic medical practice were assessed for patient-derived PRO symptoms, coupled with standardized Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) measures. Based on factors identified by the patients via support/focus groups, a diagnostic and prognostic tool was developed.ResultsThe new tool utilized PRO symptoms and included provider assessments of medical illnesses as well as resource utilization. This ‘post PRO’ tool has been applied in a variety of settings for patients with the symptoms of Gp over the last two decades. The ‘pre-PRO’ factors from the support/focus groups were compared to the PRO measures as well as the ‘post-PRO’ scale to assess their usefulness. Using methods that combine chart data, including electronic medical records (EMR), with PRO symptoms may have design implications for PRO assessment. The resultant scales, as part of a new tool, can allow for sharing of PRO derived scores in a chronic gastrointestinal (GI), illness with different practitioners.ConclusionsThese newly-derived scales offer a potentially useful tool for clinical decision-making, tailoring treatment to patient subgroups and engaging both patients and their families and caregivers in more active partnerships with providers to improve health outcomes.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s). 2016

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202311094396801ZK.pdf 1666KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:3次 浏览次数:0次