Proximal femoral nails anti-rotation versus dynamic hip screws for treatment of stable intertrochanteric femur fractures: an outcome analyses with a minimum 4 years of follow-up

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Research Article

Xinchao Zhang¹  Xingfei Zhu¹  Zuochong Yu¹  Guoqing Zha²  Jun Hu²  Weiguang Yu²  Jianhua Yi²  Yinfeng Xu²  Yunjiang Liu² 

[1] Department of Orthopaedics, Jinshan Hospital, Fudan University, Longhang Road No. 1508, Jinshan District, 201508, Shanghai City, China;Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Huangpu East Road No. 183, Huangpu District, 510700, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, China;

关键词: Intertrochanteric fracture;    Complication;    Proximal femoral nail anti-rotation;    Dynamic hip screw;    Harris hip score;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12891-016-1079-7

 received in 2016-01-17, accepted in 2016-05-13,  发布年份 2016

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundDynamic hip screws (DHSs) and proximal femoral nails anti-rotation (PFNAs) are well-documented implants for stable intertrochanteric femur fractures(IFFs); however, there is no consensus regarding which type of implant is the better option for stable IFFs. This study aimed to compare DHSs with PFNAs in the management of stable intertrochanteric fractures.MethodsA retrospective study was performed in our institution. Between June, 2005 and November, 2015, 267 patients (267 hips) with stable IFFs (AO/OTA Type 3.1A1) were treated with a DHS or a PFNA. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were designed to focus on isolated stable IFFs in ambulatory patients. Follow-up was undertaken at 1, 3, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 36, 48 postoperative months, and at final follow-up. Radiograph outcomes were obtained at all visits. The primary outcome measure was re-operation rate. The secondary outcome was patient function, evaluated using Harris hip score (HHS). Tertiary outcomes included: intra- and post-operative orthopaedic complications.ResultsTwo hundred twenty two patients (110 in the PFNA group and 112 in the DHS group) were evaluated with a mean follow-up period of 53 months (range, 48–60 months). There was an increased risk of reoperation after DHS in one-year follow-up: 0 % and 5.4 % for PFNA and DHS, respectively (P = 0.029). The difference persisted with time: 6.4 % and 13.4 % at last follow-up (P < 0.05). There are statistical differences in postoperative HHS at 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 36, 48 months postoperatively and at final follow-up. No statistical differences in medical complications was observed between the two groups. The orthopaedic complications were more in the DHS group (n = 42) compared with the PFNA group (n = 18) (P <0.05).ConclusionCompared with PFNA device, DHS device might not be the preferred implant for stable intertrochanteric femur fractures.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© Yu et al. 2016