期刊论文详细信息
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
The Key Indicator Method for Manual Handling Operations (KIM-MHO) - evaluation of a new method for the assessment of working conditions within a cross-sectional study
Study Protocol
Monika A Rieger1  Ulf Steinberg2  Falk Liebers2  André Klussmann3  Hansjürgen Gebhardt3 
[1] Department of Occupational Health and Environmental Medicine, Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University of Witten/Herdecke, Alfred-Herrhausen-Str, 50, 58448, Witten, Germany;Institute of Occupational and Social Medicine, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Wilhelmstr. 27, 72074, Tuebingen, Germany;Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Noeldnerstr. 40-42, 10317, Berlin, Germany;Institute of Occupational Health, Safety and Ergonomics (ASER) at the University of Wuppertal, Corneliusstr. 31, 42329, Wuppertal, Germany;
关键词: Occupational Health;    Carpal Tunnel Syndrome;    Musculoskeletal Symptom;    Cubital Tunnel Syndrome;    Safety Officer;   
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2474-11-272
 received in 2010-11-08, accepted in 2010-11-25,  发布年份 2010
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundUpper extremity musculoskeletal symptoms and disorders are common in the working population. The economic and social impact of such disorders is considerable. Long-time, dynamic repetitive exposure of the hand-arm system during manual handling operations (MHO) alone or in combination with static and postural effort are recognised as causes of musculoskeletal symptoms and disorders. The assessment of these manual work tasks is crucial to estimate health risks of exposed employees. For these work tasks, a new method for the assessment of the working conditions was developed by the Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA) and released as a draft in the year 2007. The draft of the so-called Key Indicator Method for Manual Handling Operations (KIM-MHO) was developed in analogy with the existing KIM for Lifting/Holding/Carrying (KIM-LHC) and Pulling/Pushing (KIM-PP) of loads. The KIM-MHO is designed to fill the gap existing in risk assessment of manual work processes, since the existing KIMs deal only with manual handling of loads.This research project focused on the following:- Examination of the validity of workplace assessment with the KIM-MHO comparing expert ratings with the results of the observations.- Examination of the objectivity of workplace assessment with the KIM-MHO applied by different examiners.- Examination of the criterion validity of the risk assessment provided by KIM-MHO with respect to the association between exposure and the occurrence and prevalence of health related outcomes.Methods/DesignTo determine the objectivity and validity of workplace assessment, the KIM-MHO is applied by occupational health and safety officers at different workplaces involving manual handling operations.To determine the criterion validity of risk assessment, a survey of employees at different workplaces takes place with standardised questionnaires and interviews about symptoms in the neck and upper extremities. In addition, physical examinations of these employees following a standardised medical diagnostic procedure are also carried out.DiscussionThis research project will provide scientific evaluation of the new KIM-MHO and, if necessary, indicate areas for modification to improve this new method for assessment of the health risk of manual handling operations at diverse workplaces.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   
© Klussmann et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010. This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202311093542649ZK.pdf 255KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  • [48]
  • [49]
  • [50]
  • [51]
  • [52]
  • [53]
  • [54]
  • [55]
  • [56]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:6次 浏览次数:1次