Is self-reporting workplace activity worthwhile? Validity and reliability of occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire in desk-based workers

BMC Public Health

Research Article

Scott J. Pedersen¹  P. Dean Cooley¹  Casey P. Mainsbridge¹  Cecilia M. Kitic²  Marie-Louise Bird² 

[1] Active Work Laboratory, Faculty of Education, University of Tasmania, Newnham Dr., TAS 7250, Launceston, Australia;School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia;

关键词: Physical activity;    Sitting behaviour;    Workplace;    Exercise;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12889-016-3537-4

 received in 2016-02-22, accepted in 2016-08-17,  发布年份 2016

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundWith the advent of workplace health and wellbeing programs designed to address prolonged occupational sitting, tools to measure behaviour change within this environment should derive from empirical evidence. In this study we measured aspects of validity and reliability for the Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity Questionnaire that asks employees to recount the percentage of work time they spend in the seated, standing, and walking postures during a typical workday.MethodsThree separate cohort samples (N = 236) were drawn from a population of government desk-based employees across several departmental agencies. These volunteers were part of a larger state-wide intervention study. Workplace sitting and physical activity behaviour was measured both subjectively against the International Physical Activity Questionnaire, and objectively against ActivPal accelerometers before the intervention began. Criterion validity and concurrent validity for each of the three posture categories were assessed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients, and a bias comparison with 95 % limits of agreement. Test-retest reliability of the survey was reported with intraclass correlation coefficients.ResultsCriterion validity for this survey was strong for sitting and standing estimates, but weak for walking. Participants significantly overestimated the amount of walking they did at work. Concurrent validity was moderate for sitting and standing, but low for walking. Test-retest reliability of this survey proved to be questionable for our sample.ConclusionsBased on our findings we must caution occupational health and safety professionals about the use of employee self-report data to estimate workplace physical activity. While the survey produced accurate measurements for time spent sitting at work it was more difficult for employees to estimate their workplace physical activity.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s). 2016