HIV prevention for South African youth: which interventions work? A systematic review of current evidence

BMC Public Health

Research Article

Abigail Harrison¹  Graeme Hoddinott²  Marie-Louise Newell³  John Imrie⁴ 

[1] Brown University, Population Studies and Training Center, and Department of Medicine, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Providence, RI, USA;University of KwaZulu Natal, Africa Centre for Health and Population Studies, Somkhele, South Africa;University of KwaZulu Natal, Africa Centre for Health and Population Studies, Somkhele, South Africa;Centre for Paediatric Epidemiology, Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK;University of KwaZulu Natal, Africa Centre for Health and Population Studies, Somkhele, South Africa;National Centre in HIV Social Research, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia;

关键词: Intimate Partner Violence;    Risk Behaviour;    Sexual Risk Behaviour;    Sexual Coercion;    Thematic Focus;   

DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-10-102

 received in 2009-09-14, accepted in 2010-02-26,  发布年份 2010

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundIn South Africa, HIV prevalence among youth aged 15-24 is among the world's highest. Given the urgent need to identify effective HIV prevention approaches, this review assesses the evidence base for youth HIV prevention in South Africa.MethodsSystematic, analytical review of HIV prevention interventions targeting youth in South Africa since 2000. Critical assessment of interventions in 4 domains: 1) study design and outcomes, 2) intervention design (content, curriculum, theory, adaptation process), 3) thematic focus and HIV causal pathways, 4) intervention delivery (duration, intensity, who, how, where).ResultsEight youth HIV prevention interventions were included; all were similar in HIV prevention content and objectives, but varied in thematic focus, hypothesised causal pathways, theoretical basis, delivery method, intensity and duration. Interventions were school- (5) or group-based (3), involving in- and out-of-school youth. Primary outcomes included HIV incidence (2), reported sexual risk behavior alone (4), or with alcohol use (2). Interventions led to reductions in STI incidence (1), and reported sexual or alcohol risk behaviours (5), although effect size varied. All but one targeted at least one structural factor associated with HIV infection: gender and sexual coercion (3), alcohol/substance use (2), or economic factors (2). Delivery methods and formats varied, and included teachers (5), peer educators (5), and older mentors (1). School-based interventions experienced frequent implementation challenges.ConclusionsKey recommendations include: address HIV social risk factors, such as gender, poverty and alcohol; target the structural and institutional context; work to change social norms; and engage schools in new ways, including participatory learning.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© Harrison et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010