Brief encounters: what do primary care professionals contribute to peoples’ self-care support network for long-term conditions? A mixed methods study

BMC Family Practice

Research Article

Christian Blickem¹  Anne Rogers²  Ivaylo Vassilev²  Anne Kennedy²  Helen Brooks³ 

[1] Centre for Public Health, Liverpool John Moores University, L3 2AJ, Liverpool, UK;NIHR CLAHRC Wessex, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Building 67, Highfield Campus, University Road, S017 1BJ, Hampshire, UK;NIHR CLARHC Greater Manchester, School of Nursing & Midwifery University of Manchester, Williamson Building, M139PL, Manchester, UK;

关键词: Primary-care professionals;    Long term conditions;    Social networks;    Self-management support;    Mixed methods;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12875-016-0417-z

 received in 2015-08-03, accepted in 2016-02-04,  发布年份 2016

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundPrimary care professionals are presumed to play a central role in delivering long-term condition management. However the value of their contribution relative to other sources of support in the life worlds of patients has been less acknowledged. Here we explore the value of primary care professionals in people’s personal communities of support for long-term condition management.MethodsA mixed methods survey with nested qualitative study designed to identify relationships and social network member’s (SNM) contributions to the support work of managing a long-term condition conducted in 2010 in the North West of England. Through engagement with a concentric circles diagram three hundred participants identified 2544 network members who contributed to illness management.ResultsThe results demonstrated how primary care professionals are involved relative to others in ongoing self-care management. Primary care professionals constituted 15.5 % of overall network members involved in chronic illness work. Their contribution was identified as being related to illness specific work providing less in terms of emotional work than close family members or pets and little to everyday work. The qualitative accounts suggested that primary care professionals are valued mainly for access to medication and nurses for informational and monitoring activities. Overall primary care is perceived as providing less input in terms of extended self-management support than the current literature on policy and practice suggests. Thus primary care professionals can be described as providing ‘minimally provided support’. This sense of a ‘minimally’ provided input reinforces limited expectations and value about what primary care professionals can provide in terms of support for long-term condition management.ConclusionsPrimary care was perceived as having an essential but limited role in making a contribution to support work for long-term conditions. This coalesces with evidence of a restricted capacity of primary care to take on the work load of self-management support work. There is a need to prioritise exploring the means by which extended self-care support could be enhanced out-with primary care. Central to this is building a system capable of engaging network capacity to mobilise resources for self-management support from open settings and the broader community.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© Rogers et al. 2016