BMC Cancer | |
A survey to determine usual care after cancer treatment within the United Kingdom national health service | |
Research Article | |
D. Ridge1  J. Deane2  T. Chalder3  M. A. Thaha4  L. Bourke5  R. Roylance6  K. S. Bhui7  M. Duncan7  P. D. White7  A. Korszun7  | |
[1] Department of Psychology, University of Westminster, London, UK;Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK;Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London, London, UK;National Bowel Research Centre, Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK;Sheffield Hallam University, Office A121, Collegiate Hall, Collegiate Crescent, S10 2BP, Sheffield, UK;University College Hospitals London, London, UK;Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK; | |
关键词: Cancer; Survey; Quality of Life; NHS; Post-treatment; Follow-up; | |
DOI : 10.1186/s12885-017-3172-1 | |
received in 2016-06-29, accepted in 2017-03-04, 发布年份 2017 | |
来源: Springer | |
【 摘 要 】
BackgroundApproximately one third of cancer survivors in the United Kingdom face ongoing and debilitating psychological and physical symptoms related to poor quality of life. Very little is known about current post-cancer treatment services.MethodsOncology healthcare professionals (HCPs) were invited to take part in a survey, which gathered both quantitative and free text data about the content and delivery of cancer aftercare and patient needs. Analysis involved descriptive statistics and content analysis.ResultsThere were 163 complete responses from 278 survey participants; 70% of NHS acute trusts provided data. HCPs views on patient post-cancer treatment needs were most frequently: fear of recurrence (95%), fatigue (94%), changes in physical capabilities (89%), anxiety (89%) and depression (88%). A median number of 2 aftercare sessions were provided (interquartile range: 1,4) lasting between 30 and 60 min. Usually these were provided face-to-face and intermittently by a HCP. However, sessions did not necessarily address the issues HCPs asserted as important. Themes from free-text responses highlighted inconsistencies in care, uncertain funding for services and omission of some evidence based approaches.ConclusionProvision of post-cancer treatment follow-up care is neither universal nor consistent in the NHS, nor does it address needs HCPs identified as most important.
【 授权许可】
CC BY
© The Author(s). 2017
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
RO202311092902158ZK.pdf | 394KB | download |
【 参考文献 】
- [1]
- [2]
- [3]
- [4]
- [5]
- [6]
- [7]
- [8]
- [9]
- [10]
- [11]
- [12]
- [13]
- [14]
- [15]
- [16]
- [17]
- [18]
- [19]
- [20]
- [21]
- [22]
- [23]
- [24]