Impact of electronic medical record on physician practice in office settings: a systematic review

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Research Article

Jeanette Boyd¹  Morgan Price²  Colin Partridge³  Heidi Bell⁴  Francis Lau⁴  Rebecca Raworth⁵ 

[1] Admirals Medical Clinic, 275 Island Hwy, V9B1G4, Victoria, Canada;Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 5950 University Blvd, V6T1Z3, Vancouver, Canada;Kootenay Boundary and Creston Community of Practice, 518 Lake Street, V1L4C6, Nelson, Canada;School of Health Information Science, University of Victoria, P.O. Box 3050, V8W3P5, STN CSC, Victoria, Canada;University of Victoria Libraries, University of Victoria, P.O. Box 1800, V8W3H5, STN CSC, Victoria, Canada;

关键词: Electronic Medical Record;    Preventive Care;    Work Practice;    Electronic Medical Record System;    Physician Office;   

DOI  :  10.1186/1472-6947-12-10

 received in 2011-08-10, accepted in 2012-02-24,  发布年份 2012

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundIncreased investments are being made for electronic medical records (EMRs) in Canada. There is a need to learn from earlier EMR studies on their impact on physician practice in office settings. To address this need, we conducted a systematic review to examine the impact of EMRs in the physician office, factors that influenced their success, and the lessons learned.ResultsFor this review we included publications cited in Medline and CINAHL between 2000 and 2009 on physician office EMRs. Studies were included if they evaluated the impact of EMR on physician practice in office settings. The Clinical Adoption Framework provided a conceptual scheme to make sense of the findings and allow for future comparison/alignment to other Canadian eHealth initiatives.In the final selection, we included 27 controlled and 16 descriptive studies. We examined six areas: prescribing support, disease management, clinical documentation, work practice, preventive care, and patient-physician interaction. Overall, 22/43 studies (51.2%) and 50/109 individual measures (45.9%) showed positive impacts, 18.6% studies and 18.3% measures had negative impacts, while the remaining had no effect. Forty-eight distinct factors were identified that influenced EMR success. Several lessons learned were repeated across studies: (a) having robust EMR features that support clinical use; (b) redesigning EMR-supported work practices for optimal fit; (c) demonstrating value for money; (d) having realistic expectations on implementation; and (e) engaging patients in the process.ConclusionsCurrently there is limited positive EMR impact in the physician office. To improve EMR success one needs to draw on the lessons from previous studies such as those in this review.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© Lau et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012