Anterior chamber paracentesis after central retinal artery occlusion: a tenable therapy?

BMC Ophthalmology

Research Article

Ulrich Helmut Steinhorst¹  Inez Frisch¹  Sven Halstenberg²  Achim Fieß²  Stephan Kehrein²  Ömer Cal² 

[1] Center of Ophthalmology, Ingelheim, Germany;Department of Ophthalmology, Dr. Horst Schmidt Clinics Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany;

关键词: Central retinal artery occlusion;    Intraocular pressure;    Paracentesis;    Retinal vascular occlusion;    Treatment;   

DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2415-14-28

 received in 2013-11-21, accepted in 2014-03-03,  发布年份 2014

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundThe goal of this study was to investigate the visual outcome of acute central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) after current standard therapy with and without paracentesis. In addition, we investigated whether there was a dependence of the resulting visual acuity on the time between first symptoms and implementation of paracentesis. Finally, we analysed risk factors for CRAO.MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of data from patients with CRAO who received standard in-patient therapy with and without paracentesis at the Dr. Horst Schmidt Clinics in Wiesbaden, Germany between 2000 and 2012. The primary endpoint was the change of visual acuity 3 days after the initiation of intervention.ResultsData from 74 patients with CRAO were included in the study. Fifteen patients were treated conservatively and 59 patients received additional paracentesis. Clinically significant improvement of BCVA (logMAR ≥ 0.3) after 3 days was observed in 26.7% of patients without paracentesis, 36.4% of patients with paracentesis within 6 hours, 20% of patients with paracentesis within 7–24 hours, and 23.1% of patients with paracentesis more than 24 hours after the onset of symptoms. There was no significant difference in the outcome between patients with (BCVA 1.9 ± 0.31) and without paracentesis (BCVA 1.75 ± 0.32) (p = 0.9), nor among the groups with paracentesis (p = 0.8). One patient suffered a lens injury due to the paracentesis, with subsequent need for cataract surgery.ConclusionsThere was no added gain in visual acuity by performing a paracentesis, independent of the time elapsed between first symptoms and the implementation of paracentesis. In the absence of any tangible effectiveness of paracentesis and the inherent risks of paracentesis such as intraocular infection and injury, paracentesis does not appear to be warranted as a treatment of CRAO.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© Fieß et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014