期刊论文详细信息
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Classification of distal radius fractures in children: good inter- and intraobserver reliability, which improves with clinical experience
Research Article
Einar A Sivertsen1  Per-Henrik Randsborg2 
[1] The Department of orthopaedic surgery, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway;The Department of orthopaedic surgery, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway;Faculty Division, University of Oslo, Norway;
关键词: Distal Radius;    Distal Radius Fracture;    Interobserver Reliability;    Intraobserver Reliability;    Kappa Score;   
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2474-13-6
 received in 2011-11-21, accepted in 2012-01-23,  发布年份 2012
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundWe wanted to test the reliability of a commonly used classification of distal radius fractures in children.Methods105 consecutive fractures of the distal radius in children were rated on two occasions three months apart by 3 groups of doctors; 4 junior registrars, 4 senior registrars and 4 orthopedic consultants. The fractures were classified as buckle, greenstick, complete or physeal. Kappa statistics were used to analyze inter- and intraobserver reliability.ResultsThe kappa value for interobserver agreement at the first reading was 0.59 for the junior registrars, 0.63 for the senior registrars and 0.66 for the consultants. The mean kappa value for intraobserver reliability was 0.79 for the senior registrars, 0.74 for the consultants and 0.66 for the junior registrars.ConclusionsWe conclude that the classification tested in this study is reliable and reproducible when applied by raters experienced in fracture management. The reliability varies according to the experience of the raters. Experienced raters can verify the classification, and avoid unnecessary follow-up appointments.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© Randsborg and Sivertsen; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202311092274164ZK.pdf 840KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:2次 浏览次数:0次