Exploring barriers to assessment of bereavement risk in palliative care: perspectives of key stakeholders

BMC Palliative Care

Research Article

Samar M. Aoun¹  Moira O’Connor²  Lauren J. Breen²  Margaret Sealey² 

[1] School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, 6845, Perth, WA, Australia;School of Psychology and Speech Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, 6845, Perth, WA, Australia;

关键词: Grief;    Bereavement;    Bereavement risk assessment;    Palliative care;    Family caregivers;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12904-015-0046-7

 received in 2015-06-30, accepted in 2015-10-08,  发布年份 2015

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundPalliative care standards advocate support for grieving caregivers, given that some bereaved people fail to integrate their loss, experience ongoing emotional suffering and adverse health outcomes. Research shows that bereavement support tends to be delivered on an ad hoc basis without formal assessment of risk or need. To align support with need, assessment of bereavement risk is necessary. The overall aim is to develop a bereavement risk assessment model, based on a three-tiered public health model, congruent with palliative care bereavement standards for use in palliative care in Western Australia. The specific aim of this phase of the study was to explore the perspectives of key stakeholders and to highlight issues in relation to the practice of bereavement risk assessment in palliative care.MethodsAction research, a cyclical process that involves working collaboratively with stakeholders, was considered as the best method to effect feasible change in practice. The nine participants were multidisciplinary health professionals from five palliative care services, and a bereaved former caregiver. Data were obtained from participants via three 90 min group meetings conducted over five weeks. An inductive thematic analysis approach was used to analyse data following each meeting until saturation was reached, and the research team was satisfied that the themes were congruent with research aims.ResultsExisting measures were found unsuitable to assess bereavement risk in palliative care. Assessment following the patient’s death presented substantial barriers, directing assessment to the pre-death period. Four themes were identified relating to issues in need of consideration to develop a risk assessment model. These were systems of care, encompassing logistics of contact with caregivers; gatekeeping; conflation between caregiver stress, burden and grief; and a way forward.ConclusionsThese group discussions provide a data-driven explanation of the issues affecting bereavement risk assessment in palliative care settings. A number of barriers will need to be overcome before assessment can become routine practice. We recommend the development of a brief, pre-death caregiver self-report measure of bereavement risk that may empower caregivers, lead to early intervention, and allow staff to remain focused on patient care, reducing burden on staff and palliative care services.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© Sealey et al. 2015