BMC Medical Education | |
Empathy among undergraduate medical students: A multi-centre cross-sectional comparison of students beginning and approaching the end of their course | |
Research Article | |
Ana da Silva1  Jonathan Hales2  Helen Moriarty3  Paul Kinnersley4  Sarah Hyde5  Thelma A Quince5  Matthew Barclay5  John Benson5  Pia Thiemann5  James Brimicombe5  Diana Wood6  | |
[1] College of Medicine, University of Swansea, SA2 8PP, Swansea, Wales, UK;Department of Medical and Social Care Education, University of Leicester, University Road, LE1 7RH, Leicester, UK;Department of Primary Health Care and General Practice, University of Otago, Wellington, PO Box 7343, 23a Mein Street, Wellington, New Zealand;Institute of Medical Education, Medical School, Cardiff University 2nd floor, Neuadd Meirionydd, Heath Park, CF14 4XN, Cardiff, UK;Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health, Primary Care University of Cambridge, IPH, Robinson Way, CB2 0SR, Cambridge, UK;School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Box 111 Cambridge Biomedical Campus, CB2 0SP, Cambridge, UK; | |
关键词: Medical students; Undergraduate; Empathy; UK; New Zealand; Jefferson Scale of Empathy-Student Version; Interpersonal Reactivity Index; | |
DOI : 10.1186/s12909-016-0603-7 | |
received in 2015-09-17, accepted in 2016-02-24, 发布年份 2016 | |
来源: Springer | |
【 摘 要 】
BackgroundAlthough a core element in patient care the trajectory of empathy during undergraduate medical education remains unclear. Empathy is generally regarded as comprising an affective capacity: the ability to be sensitive to and concerned for, another and a cognitive capacity: the ability to understand and appreciate the other person’s perspective. The authors investigated whether final year undergraduate students recorded lower levels of empathy than their first year counterparts, and whether male and female students differed in this respect.MethodsBetween September 2013 and June 2014 an online questionnaire survey was administered to 15 UK, and 2 international medical schools. Participating schools provided both 5–6 year standard courses and 4 year accelerated graduate entry courses. The survey incorporated the Jefferson Scale of Empathy-Student Version (JSE-S) and Davis’s Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI), both widely used to measure medical student empathy. Participation was voluntary. Chi squared tests were used to test for differences in biographical characteristics of student groups. Multiple linear regression analyses, in which predictor variables were year of course (first/final); sex; type of course and broad socio-economic group were used to compare empathy scores.ResultsFive medical schools (4 in the UK, 1 in New Zealand) achieved average response rates of 55 % (n = 652) among students starting their course and 48 % (n = 487) among final year students. These schools formed the High Response Rate Group. The remaining 12 medical schools recorded lower response rates of 24.0 % and 15.2 % among first and final year students respectively. These schools formed the Lower Response Rate Group. For both male and female students in both groups of schools no significant differences in any empathy scores were found between students starting and approaching the end of their course. Gender was found to significantly predict empathy scores, with females scoring higher than males.ConclusionsParticipant male and female medical students approaching the end of their undergraduate education, did not record lower levels of empathy, compared to those at the beginning of their course. Questions remain concerning the trajectory of empathy after qualification and how best to support it through the pressures of starting out in medical practice.
【 授权许可】
CC BY
© Quince et al. 2016
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
RO202311091848043ZK.pdf | 477KB | download |
【 参考文献 】
- [1]
- [2]
- [3]
- [4]
- [5]
- [6]
- [7]
- [8]
- [9]
- [10]
- [11]
- [12]
- [13]
- [14]
- [15]
- [16]
- [17]
- [18]
- [19]
- [20]
- [21]
- [22]
- [23]
- [24]
- [25]
- [26]
- [27]
- [28]
- [29]
- [30]
- [31]
- [32]
- [33]
- [34]
- [35]
- [36]
- [37]
- [38]
- [39]
- [40]
- [41]
- [42]
- [43]
- [44]
- [45]
- [46]
- [47]
- [48]
- [49]
- [50]
- [51]
- [52]
- [53]
- [54]
- [55]
- [56]
- [57]
- [58]