期刊论文详细信息
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
An online expert network for high quality information on occupational safety and health: cross-sectional study of user satisfaction and impact
Research Article
Martijn DF Rhebergen1  Frank JH van Dijk1  Carel TJ Hulshof2  Annet F Lenderink3 
[1] Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam/University of Amsterdam, PO Box: 22700, 1100, Amsterdam, DE, The Netherlands;Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam/University of Amsterdam, PO Box: 22700, 1100, Amsterdam, DE, The Netherlands;Centre of Excellence, Netherlands Society of Occupational Medicine (NVAB), PO Box 2113, 3500, Utrecht, GC, The Netherlands;Netherlands Center for Occupational Diseases, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam/University of Amsterdam, PO Box: 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
关键词: Health Literacy;    Multiple Logistic Regression Analysis;    Work Functioning;    User Satisfaction;    Network Quality;   
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-6947-11-72
 received in 2011-08-17, accepted in 2011-11-23,  发布年份 2011
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundMany people have difficulties finding information on health questions, including occupational safety and health (OSH) issues. One solution to alleviate these difficulties could be to offer questioners free-of-charge, online access to a network of OSH experts who provide tailored, high-quality information. The aim of this study was to assess whether network quality, respectively information quality, as perceived by the questioners, is associated with questioners' overall satisfaction and to explore the impact of the information received on questioners' knowledge, work and work functioning.MethodsWe evaluated the experiences of OSH questioners with the online network ArboAntwoord.com over a two-year period. In this network, approximately 80 qualified experts are available to answer OSH questions. By means of a questionnaire, we assessed questioners' overall satisfaction with the network, whether the network was user-friendly, easily accessible and easy to handle and whether the information provided was complete, applicable and received in a timely manner. The impact of the information on questioners' knowledge, work or work functioning was explored with seven questions. In the study period, 460 unique OSH questioners asked 851 OSH questions. In total, 205 of the 460 questioners completed the questionnaire (response rate 45%).ResultsOf the responders, 71% were satisfied with the ArboAntwoord network. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that the applicability of the information had a positive influence on the questioners' overall satisfaction (OR = 16.0, 95% CI: 7.0-36.4). Also, user friendliness of the network (OR = 3.3, 95% CI: 1.3-8.6) and completeness of the information provided (OR = 3.0, 95% CI: 1.3-6.8) were positively related to the questioners' satisfaction. For 74% of the questioners, the information helped to increase their knowledge and understanding. Overall, 25% of the questioners indicated that the received information improved their work, work functioning or health.ConclusionsA free-of-charge, online expert network in the field of OSH can be a useful strategy to provide OSH questioners with applicable, complete and timely information that may help improve safety and health at work. This study provides more insight in how to satisfy network questioners and about the potential impact of provided information on OSH.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© Rhebergen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202311091556811ZK.pdf 370KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  • [48]
  • [49]
  • [50]
  • [51]
  • [52]
  • [53]
  • [54]
  • [55]
  • [56]
  • [57]
  • [58]
  • [59]
  • [60]
  • [61]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:1次 浏览次数:1次