期刊论文详细信息
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
A multicriteria decision making approach applied to improving maintenance policies in healthcare organizations
Research Article
María Carmen Carnero1  Andrés Gómez2 
[1] Business Administration Department, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Avda. Camilo José Cela s/n, 13071, Ciudad Real, Spain;Centre for Management Studies (CEG-IST), University of Lisbon, Instituto Superior Tecnico, Lisbon, Portugal;Business Administration Department, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Avda. Camilo José Cela s/n, 13071, Ciudad Real, Spain;SESCAM, University General Hospital of Ciudad Real, C/Obispo Rafael Torija s/n, 13005, Ciudad Real, Spain;
关键词: Maintenance policies;    Multicriteria analysis;    MACBETH;    Decision-making techniques;    Markov chains;    Healthcare organizations;    Dialysis subsystems;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12911-016-0282-7
 received in 2015-09-03, accepted in 2016-04-08,  发布年份 2016
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundHealthcare organizations have far greater maintenance needs for their medical equipment than other organization, as many are used directly with patients. However, the literature on asset management in healthcare organizations is very limited. The aim of this research is to provide more rational application of maintenance policies, leading to an increase in quality of care.MethodsThis article describes a multicriteria decision-making approach which integrates Markov chains with the multicriteria Measuring Attractiveness by a Categorical Based Evaluation Technique (MACBETH), to facilitate the best choice of combination of maintenance policies by using the judgements of a multi-disciplinary decision group. The proposed approach takes into account the level of acceptance that a given alternative would have among professionals. It also takes into account criteria related to cost, quality of care and impact of care cover.ResultsThis multicriteria approach is applied to four dialysis subsystems: patients infected with hepatitis C, infected with hepatitis B, acute and chronic; in all cases, the maintenance strategy obtained consists of applying corrective and preventive maintenance plus two reserve machines.ConclusionsThe added value in decision-making practices from this research comes from: (i) integrating the use of Markov chains to obtain the alternatives to be assessed by a multicriteria methodology; (ii) proposing the use of MACBETH to make rational decisions on asset management in healthcare organizations; (iii) applying the multicriteria approach to select a set or combination of maintenance policies in four dialysis subsystems of a health care organization. In the multicriteria decision making approach proposed, economic criteria have been used, related to the quality of care which is desired for patients (availability), and the acceptance that each alternative would have considering the maintenance and healthcare resources which exist in the organization, with the inclusion of a decision-making group. This approach is better suited to actual health care organization practice and depending on the subsystem analysed, improvements are introduced that are not included in normal maintenance policies; in this way, not only have different maintenance policies been suggested, but also alternatives that, in each case and according to viability, provide a more complete decision tool for the maintenance manager.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© Carnero and Gómez. 2016

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202311091490802ZK.pdf 3262KB PDF download
12864_2017_4130_Article_IEq18.gif 1KB Image download
12864_2017_4030_Article_IEq6.gif 1KB Image download
12864_2015_2055_Article_IEq89.gif 1KB Image download
【 图 表 】

12864_2015_2055_Article_IEq89.gif

12864_2017_4030_Article_IEq6.gif

12864_2017_4130_Article_IEq18.gif

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  • [48]
  • [49]
  • [50]
  • [51]
  • [52]
  • [53]
  • [54]
  • [55]
  • [56]
  • [57]
  • [58]
  • [59]
  • [60]
  • [61]
  • [62]
  • [63]
  • [64]
  • [65]
  • [66]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:1次