期刊论文详细信息
BMC Medical Education
Situational awareness within objective structured clinical examination stations in undergraduate medical training - a literature search
Research Article
Steven Durning1  Marlies P. Schijven2  Paul O’Connor3  Kieran M. Kennedy4  Thomas J. B. Kropmans4  Markus A. Fischer4  Eva Doherty5  Jean Ker6 
[1] Department of Internal Medicine, University of the Health Sciences, 4301 Jones Bridge Road, 20814, Bethesda, MD, USA;Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam-Zuidoost, The Netherlands;National University Galway Ireland, Discipline of General Practice, Distillery Road, H91TK33, Galway, Ireland;National University Ireland Galway, School of Medicine, University Road, H91TK33, Galway, Ireland;Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St Stephen’s Green, Dublin 2, Ireland;University of Dundee. Clinical Skills Centre Level 6, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Dundee, UK;
关键词: Situational awareness;    Undergraduate medical education;    Objective structured clinical examination;    Diagnostic reasoning;    Clinical reasoning;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12909-017-1105-y
 received in 2016-11-09, accepted in 2017-12-12,  发布年份 2017
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundMedical students may not be able to identify the essential elements of situational awareness (SA) necessary for clinical reasoning. Recent studies suggest that students have little insight into cognitive processing and SA in clinical scenarios. Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) could be used to assess certain elements of situational awareness. The purpose of this paper is to review the literature with a view to identifying whether levels of SA based on Endsley’s model can be assessed utilising OSCEs during undergraduate medical training.MethodsA systematic search was performed pertaining to SA and OSCEs, to identify studies published between January 1975 (first paper describing an OSCE) and February 2017, in peer reviewed international journals published in English. PUBMED, EMBASE, PsycINFO Ovid and SCOPUS were searched for papers that described the assessment of SA using OSCEs among undergraduate medical students. Key search terms included “objective structured clinical examination”, “objective structured clinical assessment” or “OSCE” and “non-technical skills”, “sense-making”, “clinical reasoning”, “perception”, “comprehension”, “projection”, “situation awareness”, “situational awareness” and “situation assessment”. Boolean operators (AND, OR) were used as conjunctions to narrow the search strategy, resulting in the limitation of papers relevant to the research interest. Areas of interest were elements of SA that can be assessed by these examinations.ResultsThe initial search of the literature retrieved 1127 publications. Upon removal of duplicates and papers relating to nursing, paramedical disciplines, pharmacy and veterinary education by title, abstract or full text, 11 articles were eligible for inclusion as related to the assessment of elements of SA in undergraduate medical students.DiscussionReview of the literature suggests that whole-task OSCEs enable the evaluation of SA associated with clinical reasoning skills. If they address the levels of SA, these OSCEs can provide supportive feedback and strengthen educational measures associated with higher diagnostic accuracy and reasoning abilities.ConclusionBased on the findings, the early exposure of medical students to SA is recommended, utilising OSCEs to evaluate and facilitate SA in dynamic environments.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s). 2017

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202311091261421ZK.pdf 1057KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  • [48]
  • [49]
  • [50]
  • [51]
  • [52]
  • [53]
  • [54]
  • [55]
  • [56]
  • [57]
  • [58]
  • [59]
  • [60]
  • [61]
  • [62]
  • [63]
  • [64]
  • [65]
  • [66]
  • [67]
  • [68]
  • [69]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:5次 浏览次数:0次