Risk factors for revision of primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Research Article

Julian JZ Prokopetz¹  John Wright²  Elena Losina³  Jeffrey N Katz⁴  John A Baron⁵  Robin L Bliss⁶ 

[1]Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

[2]Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

[3]Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

[4]Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

[5]Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

[6]Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA

[7]Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

[8]Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

[9]Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA

[10]Orthopedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis St. OBC-4, 02115, Boston, MA, USA

[11]University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

[12]Veristat, Inc, Holliston, MA, USA

关键词: Total hip arthroplasty;    Revision;    Failure;    Risk factor;    Aseptic loosening;    Infection;    Dislocation;    Systematic review;   

DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2474-13-251

 received in 2012-04-26, accepted in 2012-12-05,  发布年份 2012

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundNumerous papers have been published examining risk factors for revision of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), but there have been no comprehensive systematic literature reviews that summarize the most recent findings across a broad range of potential predictors.MethodsWe performed a PubMed search for papers published between January, 2000 and November, 2010 that provided data on risk factors for revision of primary THA. We collected data on revision for any reason, as well as on revision for aseptic loosening, infection, or dislocation. For each risk factor that was examined in at least three papers, we summarize the number and direction of statistically significant associations reported.ResultsEighty-six papers were included in our review. Factors found to be associated with revision included younger age, greater comorbidity, a diagnosis of avascular necrosis (AVN) as compared to osteoarthritis (OA), low surgeon volume, and larger femoral head size. Male sex was associated with revision due to aseptic loosening and infection. Longer operating time was associated with revision due to infection. Smaller femoral head size was associated with revision due to dislocation.ConclusionsThis systematic review of literature published between 2000 and 2010 identified a range of demographic, clinical, surgical, implant, and provider variables associated with the risk of revision following primary THA. These findings can inform discussions between surgeons and patients relating to the risks and benefits of undergoing total hip arthroplasty.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   
© Prokopetz et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012. This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.