Effects of measurement methods and growing conditions on phenotypic expression of photosynthesis in seven diverse rice genotypes

Frontiers in Plant Science

Plant Science

Megan Reavis¹  Kusum Naithani¹  Larry C. Purcell²  Andy Pereira² 

[1] Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States;Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States;

关键词: genotypes;    light response curve;    phenotypic plasticity;    phenotyping;    photosynthesis model;    rice;    sequential and non-sequential method;   

DOI  :  10.3389/fpls.2023.1106672

 received in 2022-11-24, accepted in 2023-08-18,  发布年份 2023

来源: Frontiers

【 摘 要 】

IntroductionLight response curves are widely used to quantify phenotypic expression of photosynthesis by measuring a single sample and sequentially altering light intensity within a chamber (sequential method) or by measuring different samples that are each acclimated to a different light level (non-sequential method). Both methods are often conducted in controlled environments to achieve steady-state results, and neither method involves equilibrating the entire plant to the specific light level. MethodsHere, we compare sequential and non-sequential methods in controlled (greenhouse), semi-controlled (plant grown in growth chamber and acclimated to field conditions 2-3 days before measurements), and field environments. We selected seven diverse rice genotypes (five genotypes from the USDA rice minicore collection: 310588, 310723, 311644, 311677, 311795; and 2 additional genotypes: Nagina 22 and Zhe 733) to understand (1) the limitations of different methods, and (2) phenotypic plasticity of photosynthesis in rice grown under different environments. ResultsOur results show that the non-sequential method was time-efficient and captured more variability of field conditions than the sequential method, but the model parameters were generally similar between two methods except the maximum photosynthesis rate (Amax). Amax was significantly lower across all genotypes under greenhouse conditions compared to the growth chamber and field conditions consistent with prior work, but surprisingly the apparent quantum yield (α) and the mitochondrial respiration (Rd) were generally not different among growing environments or measurement methods. DiscussionOur results suggest that field conditions are best suited to quantify phenotypic differences across different genotypes and nonsequential method was better at capturing the variability in photosynthesis.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   
Copyright © 2023 Reavis, Purcell, Pereira and Naithani